2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This paves the way for dynamic studies with high pathoanatomic detail at an optimal temporal resolution for kinetic analysis. [37] …”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Resolution In Dce Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paves the way for dynamic studies with high pathoanatomic detail at an optimal temporal resolution for kinetic analysis. [37] …”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Resolution In Dce Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excellent spatial resolution achieved with endorectal coil 3T MRI with at least halving the voxel size (voxel size, 0.35 mm3 v 0.66-1.12 mm3), reveals pathoanatomic details on T2-W images not seen at 1.5T or 3T without endorectal coil. [37] …”
Section: T2-weighted (T2w) Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3T MRI has been available for diagnosis of prostate cancer, and its merits have been reported in [4,5,6]. However, the application of high-field closed-bore MRI to prostate intervention is still limited, because of its limited access to the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SNR increase provided by an ERC can only be partially replaced by a two-fold SNR improvement associated with doubling the magnet strength. Nevertheless, with advances in pulse sequence design, several groups reported that studies done solely with 6 to 32 phased array surface coils at 3T yielded comparable images as the exams conducted with 1.5T scanners with an endorectal coil [35][36][37][38][39]. Comparison studies with and without ERC at 3T have shown increased sensitivity (0.45, no ERC and 0.75, with ERC) and positive predictive value (0.64, no ERC and 0.80, ERC) for prostate cancer detection [40] (Fig.…”
Section: Hardware and Software Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%