35 Enhanced Service Through An Integrated New Model of Care in A Buckinghamshire Care Home

Abstract

Introduction Care home residents often have multiple, chronic conditions and are receiving complex treatment regimes. Polypharmacy and medication errors are common. The frequency and quality of medication reviews is variable with limited general practice (GP) capacity to carry out comprehensive reviews. The initiative used a care home pharmacist, technician, geriatrician and GPs to tackle these issues on an individual and care home level. The objective being to ensure the safe and effective use of medicines for all care home residents. NICE guideline [NG56] recommends reducing pharmacological treatment burden for adults with multimorbidity at risk of adverse drug events such as unplanned hospital admissions. A study by Dilles et al1 found adverse drug reactions in 60% of residents. Methods A new interdisciplinary model of care was delivered in a 120 bedded Buckinghamshire care home. Clinical Commissioning Group pharmacist, general practitioners and pharmacy technician reviewed medication for all residents. The most complex individuals were reviewed by the geriatrician and if needed by other multidisciplinary team members specialist. Results Overall 115 medications were stopped for 109 residents, with 31 interventions to reduce falls risk and 19 interventions on medication at high risk2 of causing admission. Total cost savings on medicines optimisation, medicines waste and non-elective admission prevented was £35,211. Residents’ care plans were updated to reflect best practice standards. Conclusions Future direction of this project focuses on system wide improvements to promote interdisciplinary healthcare professionals work in care homes. The success of this integrated model of care has enabled recurrent funding of pharmacist by the local county council and an additional 42 geriatrician sessions into Buckinghamshire care homes. References 1. Dilles T, Vander Stichele R, Van Bortel L, Elseviers M. Journal of American Medical Directors Association 2013; 14: 371–6. 2. Pirmohamed M, et al. Br Med J 2004; 329: 15–9 61.