2018
DOI: 10.1190/geo2017-0236.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D elastic full-waveform inversion using P-wave excitation amplitude: Application to ocean bottom cable field data

Abstract: CitationOh J-W, Kalita M, Alkhalifah T (2017) 3D elastic full waveform inversion using P-wave excitation amplitude: Application to OBC field data. GEOPHYSICS: 1-87. AbstractWe propose an efficient elastic full waveform inversion (FWI) based on the P-wave excitation amplitude (maximum energy arrival) approximation in the source wavefields.Because, based on the P-wave excitation approximation (ExA), the gradient direction is approximated by the cross-correlation of source and receiver wavefields at only excitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a reasonable assumption for practical seismic imaging application, since we always can obtain the smooth background velocity models by the classic migration velocity analysis and tomography. When the inverted P‐wave and S‐wave velocity models with high‐wavenumber components are http://built from elastic full waveform inversion (Petrov and Newman, 2017; Kalita and Alkhalifah, 2017; Oh et al ., 2018; Thiel et al ., 2019), the most efficient and simplest approach to invalidate the assumption is to smooth the velocity models with high‐wavenumber components, prior to the elastic wavefield extrapolation. However, the amount of smoothing required is model dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a reasonable assumption for practical seismic imaging application, since we always can obtain the smooth background velocity models by the classic migration velocity analysis and tomography. When the inverted P‐wave and S‐wave velocity models with high‐wavenumber components are http://built from elastic full waveform inversion (Petrov and Newman, 2017; Kalita and Alkhalifah, 2017; Oh et al ., 2018; Thiel et al ., 2019), the most efficient and simplest approach to invalidate the assumption is to smooth the velocity models with high‐wavenumber components, prior to the elastic wavefield extrapolation. However, the amount of smoothing required is model dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multipathing is the concept that seismic energy can travel along various paths between two points (source and receiver), giving rise to multivalued traveltimes (Nguyen and McMechan, 2015). There are many studies in acoustic RTM (Jin et al ., 2015; Kalita and Alkhalifah, 2016), elastic RTM (Du et al ., 2015; Wang and McMechan, 2015) acoustic and elastic full waveform inversion (FWI) (Kalita and Alkhalifah, 2017; Oh et al ., 2018) to demonstrate that the EA imaging condition does not significantly degrade the quality of seismic migration and inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simultaneous update scheme for all parameters may suffer from tradeoff issues due to velocity update leakage (Li et al, 2018). Oh et al (2018) used a hierarchical inversion for ocean bottom cable field data. They start their inversion with an acoustic FWI, and gradually include more anisotropic parameters in late stages of the inversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for a huge 3D problem, we need a large number of computational resources to save forward and backward wavefields on every grid point and at every time step. To reduce computational cost, the excitation approach (Kalita and Alkhalifah ; Oh, Kalita and Alkhalifah ) and the boundary‐saving method were suggested, in which we only store the forward wavefields at the model boundary and then we reconstruct the full forward wavefields by back propagating the boundary values (Mitter ; Yang, Gao and Wang ). This approach provided reasonable FWI results for a large‐scale 3D elastic problem (Raknes and Arntsen ; Raknes and Weibull ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%