2007
DOI: 10.1108/03321640710751145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

3D topology optimization using an immune algorithm

Abstract: 3D Topology Optimization Using an Immune Algorithm AbstractPurpose -The paper introduces an evolutionary algorithm based on the artificial immune systems paradigm for topology optimization in 3D.Design/methodology/approach -The 3D topology optimization algorithm is described, and experimentally validated on an electromagnetic design problem.Findings -The proposed method is capable of finding an optimal configuration for the validation problem used.Research limitations/implications -More tests are needed in ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[53], [52], [54] • Evolutionary algorithms with custom operators [64], [19], [68], [69], [89], [20] • Differential evolution [90], [91], [92] • Artificial immune systems [93], [94], [95], [96] • Hill climbing [48], [50] • Pattern search [59], [97] • Particle swarm optimization [47], [98], [99], [100] • Simulated annealing [101], [52], [102], [53], [51] • Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) [61], [62], [63], [44], [103], [104], [105] • Ant colony optimization [106], [107], [108] • Constrained optimization by linear approximations (COBYLA) [55], [56], [109] • Random search [56], [109] • Structural stiffness and/or strength [75], [18], [21], …”
Section: Design Domain Representations Optimization Algorithms Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[53], [52], [54] • Evolutionary algorithms with custom operators [64], [19], [68], [69], [89], [20] • Differential evolution [90], [91], [92] • Artificial immune systems [93], [94], [95], [96] • Hill climbing [48], [50] • Pattern search [59], [97] • Particle swarm optimization [47], [98], [99], [100] • Simulated annealing [101], [52], [102], [53], [51] • Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) [61], [62], [63], [44], [103], [104], [105] • Ant colony optimization [106], [107], [108] • Constrained optimization by linear approximations (COBYLA) [55], [56], [109] • Random search [56], [109] • Structural stiffness and/or strength [75], [18], [21], …”
Section: Design Domain Representations Optimization Algorithms Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plenty of different domain-specific optimization approaches have been proposed since then, based on genetic algorithms [22,43,103,196,203,205], artificial immune system algorithms [37,111], particle swarm optimization [110,112] or modified binary differential evolution [211]. Multiobjective genetic algorithms combined with local search operators have been applied [161,162], as well.…”
Section: Grid Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By reducing the constraint value for the shielding area at each optimization step, the effective topology of the magnetostatic shielding is computed. Only the genetic algorithm (GA) (Holland, 1975) had previously been implemented for the MS procedure; hence, a comparison with the immune algorithm (IA) (Farmer et al, 1986;Campelo et al, 2007) was drawn. Furthermore, an additional search (AS) in the restricted design space was added to the conventional MS procedure to produce a better solution for the next optimization step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%