“…Of those, four studies were discarded for the following reasons: (a) non‐RCT design, (b) studies not included data of interest or not provided sufficient data for the outcomes, and (c) irrelevant for the meta‐analysis. Finally, 10 studies (Bedakhanian, Entezari, Ghanadian, Askari, & Maracy, 2017; Dehghan et al, 2016; Fakoori Jouibari, Farzanegi, & Barari, 2014; Farzanegi, 2014; Gheflati et al, 2019; Ghorbanian, Saberi, Azali Alamdari, Shokrollahi, & Mohammadi, 2019; Mohammadzadeh et al, 2016; Parvin, Farzaneh, Vardanjani, Goodarzi, & Nikfarjam, 2013; Rafiee Vardanjani et al, 2013; Zakizadeh et al, 2015) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the quantitative meta‐analysis. Four studies reported the CRP (Bedakhanian et al, 2017; Dehghan et al, 2016; Farzanegi, 2014; Parvin et al, 2013), five (Fakoori Jouibari et al, 2014; Gheflati et al, 2019; Ghorbanian et al, 2019; Rafiee Vardanjani et al, 2013; Zakizadeh et al, 2015), four (Gheflati et al, 2019; Ghorbanian et al, 2019; Mohammadzadeh et al, 2016; Zakizadeh et al, 2015), and three (Fakoori Jouibari et al, 2014; Ghorbanian et al, 2019; Mohammadzadeh et al, 2016) articles reported MDA, TAC, and SOD, respectively, as outcomes.…”