2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.06.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

460 Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging And Cardiac Computed Tomography For Quantification Of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control cohort was not included in the mortality analysis due to its significantly lower age and short duration of follow-up. The focus of the outcome analysis was the effect of fibrosis on outcome; therefore, patients with dual pathology AS-ATTR were excluded (this is unique to other ECV CT studies 9 ); this cohort per se was too small to make any inferences about mortality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control cohort was not included in the mortality analysis due to its significantly lower age and short duration of follow-up. The focus of the outcome analysis was the effect of fibrosis on outcome; therefore, patients with dual pathology AS-ATTR were excluded (this is unique to other ECV CT studies 9 ); this cohort per se was too small to make any inferences about mortality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent innovative research has highlighted the substantial potential within CT, including the ability to assess ECV by CT (ECV CT ), which, indeed, correlates well with ECV from CMR. 8 The ECV CT protocol involves, besides the routine arterial phase, 2 additional acquisitions: first, a native CT before the injection of iodine contrast; second, late images for ECV CT analysis, typically scanned 3 to 10 minutes after arterial phase contrast injection. 9 The ECV CT is calculated based on the rate of change in Hounsfield Units in the myocardium relative to blood, before and after contrast, adjusted for hematocrit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%