2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

64 slice-coronary computed tomography sensitivity and specificity in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft stenosis: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systemic review of Chan and colleagues involving 1975 patients and 5364 grafts demonstrated that MDCT had the aggregated sensitivity and speci city of 98% (95% CI: 97-99%) and 98% (95% CI: 96-98%) in the assessment of bypass graft occlusion and stenosis [5]. Similarly, a study of Barbero and colleagues concluded that the diagnostic sensitivity and speci city for combined assessment of occlusion and stenosis were both over 98% [6]. Although MDCT could not replace ICA in conduit patency assessment after CABG at present, MDCT can obtain clear graft images and plays a crucial role in the evaluation of grafts, especially for asymptomatic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systemic review of Chan and colleagues involving 1975 patients and 5364 grafts demonstrated that MDCT had the aggregated sensitivity and speci city of 98% (95% CI: 97-99%) and 98% (95% CI: 96-98%) in the assessment of bypass graft occlusion and stenosis [5]. Similarly, a study of Barbero and colleagues concluded that the diagnostic sensitivity and speci city for combined assessment of occlusion and stenosis were both over 98% [6]. Although MDCT could not replace ICA in conduit patency assessment after CABG at present, MDCT can obtain clear graft images and plays a crucial role in the evaluation of grafts, especially for asymptomatic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier venous graft disease detection and evaluation of extracardiac anatomical features are additional advantages of CT-CAG. 8…”
Section: Key Issues In Coronary Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This role is termed as the potential "gatekeeper" role of CTA in the meta-analysis study performed by Barbero et al They concluded that ICA has a higher cost compared to CTA, and it is inconvenient for most of the patients due to the need for sedation with resultant driving restrictions, as well as a low risk of stroke, infarction, dissection, arrhythmia, or death. On the other hand, CTA is a noninvasive procedure, and it is highly accepted by patients [9].…”
Section: The Value Of Cta In the Context Of Cardiovascular Imaging Fomentioning
confidence: 99%