PsycTESTS Dataset 2021
DOI: 10.1037/t81102-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7-Component Vaccination Readiness Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For those who were not up-to-date with DTP vaccination or did not know their status, we measured their intention to get a booster within the next 3 months (same answer scale as above). For all participants, we used the 7C scale short form, 42 validated in French 43 and including seven items measuring seven dimensions of VR: “confidence” in health authorities to ensure vaccine safety and efficacy; “complacency,” i.e., low perception of risks associated with developing an infectious disease; structural or psychological “constraints” making vaccination difficult or costly; “calculation,” i.e., perceived personal benefit/risk balance of vaccines; “collective responsibility,” i.e., willingness to protect others acting collectively; “compliance,” i.e., support for sanctioning unvaccinated people; “conspiracy,” i.e., believing that vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they ought to protect from). This survey uses a five-level agreement Likert scale (1=“Strongly disagree” to 5=“Strongly agree,” with a “don’t know” option placed in the middle of the scale).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those who were not up-to-date with DTP vaccination or did not know their status, we measured their intention to get a booster within the next 3 months (same answer scale as above). For all participants, we used the 7C scale short form, 42 validated in French 43 and including seven items measuring seven dimensions of VR: “confidence” in health authorities to ensure vaccine safety and efficacy; “complacency,” i.e., low perception of risks associated with developing an infectious disease; structural or psychological “constraints” making vaccination difficult or costly; “calculation,” i.e., perceived personal benefit/risk balance of vaccines; “collective responsibility,” i.e., willingness to protect others acting collectively; “compliance,” i.e., support for sanctioning unvaccinated people; “conspiracy,” i.e., believing that vaccines are more dangerous than the diseases they ought to protect from). This survey uses a five-level agreement Likert scale (1=“Strongly disagree” to 5=“Strongly agree,” with a “don’t know” option placed in the middle of the scale).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Існують також інші методи вимірювання готовності до вакцинації, наприклад, шкала "7С", яка має додаткові субшкали: "Конспірацію" та "Комплаєнс" (Geiger et al, 2022;Henkel et al, 2022;Sprengholz et al, 2022). Однак, на…”
Section: Ivan Danyliuk Anton Kurapov Karine Malyshevaunclassified
“…There are also other methods for measuring vaccination readiness, such as the 7C scale, which has additional subscales: "Conspiracy" and "Compliance" (Geiger et al, 2022;Henkel et al, 2022;Sprengholz et al, 2022). However, according to C. , the "5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination" scale is more suitable for monitoring and assessing a person's readiness for vaccination in the field, and the data obtained with its help is easier to process and use in diagnosis.…”
Section: Ivan Danyliuk Anton Kurapov Karine Malyshevamentioning
confidence: 99%