83 Electrocardiogram in Syncope: An old habit or clinically helpful?

Abstract

Background Syncope affects up to 50% of individuals by age 21 years and accounts for 1% of presentations to the emergency department (ED). Cardiac causes of syncope, including structural heart defects and rhythm disorders, cannot always be ruled out by an electrocardiogram (ECG) as this test lacks sensitivity and specificity. Conflicting recommendations for the role of ECG in evaluation of pediatric syncope underscore the clinical equipoise of how ECG findings influence physicians’ clinical decisions. Objectives The primary objective of this study is to determine how ECG findings affect ED physicians’ management of children presenting with vasovagal syncope. Our secondary objective is to document the practice pattern variation among ED physicians regarding their decision to obtain an ECG for the evaluation of vasovagal syncope in children. Design/Methods We conducted a prospective cross-sectional survey study using the REDCap platform. Our sample frame consisted of practicing emergency physicians enrolled in the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC) network. Outcome measures included frequency investigations, specialist consultation, and disposition stratified by type of syncope presentation (low/high risk). We also evaluated which specific ECG findings were likely to change physicians’ management and explored factors influencing the decision to perform or not perform the ECG. Results We obtained data from 105/225 (47%) potential respondents. In a clinical scenario presenting a vasovagal syncope, 52% of respondents would order an ECG. Forty-five percent changed their management if the ECG interpretation was anything other than “Normal ECG”. In a high-risk syncope scenario, an ECG was performed by 96% of respondents. Cardiology referral was requested by 93% of respondents, despite normal ECG findings. Borderline ECG findings led to significant practice variation in management, for both low and high-risk presentations scenarios. Overall, 66% of respondents stated that performing an ECG is not important to rule out a cardiac etiology in a typical vasovagal syncope presentation, but 64% stated that performing an ECG is important to reassure the patient. Conclusion There is substantial practice pattern variation among emergency physicians with regards to the frequency and motivations to order ECGs, and how ECG findings impact the management of pediatric syncope in the ED. Information provided by an ECG can lead to unnecessary change to clinical management, additional testing, and referrals to specialists for typical vasovagal syncope. This reinforces the importance of better knowledge translation surrounding evidence-based management of vasovagal syncope among ED physicians.