2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.1014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

875P Performance and diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on urine and self-collected vaginal samples in a referral population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another recent Korean study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two PCR-based hrHPV assays (Realtime HR-S and Anyplex II) on self-collected vaginal and urine samples for the detection of cervical precancer in a colposcopy population. In this study, Cho et al conclude that despite the comparable detection performance for hrHPV and CIN2+ on self-collected vaginal samples and clinician-collected cervical samples, the performance of these two particular hrHPV tests using urine was inferior to those using clinician-collected cervical samples in terms of detecting hrHPV and CIN2+ ( Table 2 ) [ 42 ]. In the most recent study, Cadman et al compared the performance of four vaginal self-sampling devices, including wet and dry transport methods between themselves and an initial stream urine sample using the Becton Dickinson Onclarity assay in 600 women referred for colposcopy.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Urine Hpv Testingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another recent Korean study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two PCR-based hrHPV assays (Realtime HR-S and Anyplex II) on self-collected vaginal and urine samples for the detection of cervical precancer in a colposcopy population. In this study, Cho et al conclude that despite the comparable detection performance for hrHPV and CIN2+ on self-collected vaginal samples and clinician-collected cervical samples, the performance of these two particular hrHPV tests using urine was inferior to those using clinician-collected cervical samples in terms of detecting hrHPV and CIN2+ ( Table 2 ) [ 42 ]. In the most recent study, Cadman et al compared the performance of four vaginal self-sampling devices, including wet and dry transport methods between themselves and an initial stream urine sample using the Becton Dickinson Onclarity assay in 600 women referred for colposcopy.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Urine Hpv Testingmentioning
confidence: 95%