1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(96)00175-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 12-month comparative clinical investigation of a levonorgestrel-releasing intracervical device situated in the uterine cavity or cervical canal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…110 Six studies (20%) stated that they only included women with a regular menstrual cycle. 87,98,115,[120][121][122] Nearly all of the studies, for both the RCTs and the non-randomised prospective cohorts, were either comparisons of IUSs with different hormonal dosage release rates or of IUSs versus non-hormonal IUDs. The two exceptions were studies by Wang and colleagues 47 who compared the LNG-20 IUS with Norplant-2, and Sivin and colleagues 72 who investigated return to fertility after discontinuation of subdermal implants, IUSs or IUDs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…110 Six studies (20%) stated that they only included women with a regular menstrual cycle. 87,98,115,[120][121][122] Nearly all of the studies, for both the RCTs and the non-randomised prospective cohorts, were either comparisons of IUSs with different hormonal dosage release rates or of IUSs versus non-hormonal IUDs. The two exceptions were studies by Wang and colleagues 47 who compared the LNG-20 IUS with Norplant-2, and Sivin and colleagues 72 who investigated return to fertility after discontinuation of subdermal implants, IUSs or IUDs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the remaining 17 trials, ten provided information on method of randomisation (see appendix 6). 43,47,73,85,87,98,99,101,106,114 Eight trials documented that allocation of contraceptive method was concealed to the investigator, 43,47,73,87,98,99,106,113 but in only three studies was assessment of outcomes blinded. 101,113,114 Women remained blind to allocated method in an additional two studies.…”
Section: Rctsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations