2002 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37353)
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2002.1010580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2 GHz CMOS even harmonic mixer for direct conversion receivers

Abstract: An even harmonic mixer implemented in a 0.25pm standard digital CMOS process for applications in 2GHz direct conversion receivers is described. The novel mixer circuit overcomes the classical DC offset problems that degrade the sensitivity performance of direct conversion receivers using conventional mixers. Simulated with a 1% g, mismatch, the new even harmonic mixer achieves excellent DC offset cancellation and IIP2 values of 87dB and +40dBm, respectively. The mixer draws 1.7111~4 from a single 3V power supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the performance is carried out between the four circuits. They are the proposed even harmonic switching mixer, the even harmonic mixers in [8] and [9], and the switching mixer in [41]. The proposed circuit was constructed and simulated using Cadence SpectreRF.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A comparison of the performance is carried out between the four circuits. They are the proposed even harmonic switching mixer, the even harmonic mixers in [8] and [9], and the switching mixer in [41]. The proposed circuit was constructed and simulated using Cadence SpectreRF.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another disadvantage of [8] is the higher cost of the BiCMOS technology. The even harmonic mixer in [9] is implemented in a 0.25nm standard CMOS process. So the noise figure is high due to the high flicker noise.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation