2011
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2011.2109470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 250 mV, 352 $\mu$W GPS Receiver RF Front-End in 130 nm CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result shows that S 11 of the LNA-Mixer is less than −18 dB over a frequency range of 1.5∼1. 6 GHz. An appropriate input matching network guarantees well performance of S 11 and NF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result shows that S 11 of the LNA-Mixer is less than −18 dB over a frequency range of 1.5∼1. 6 GHz. An appropriate input matching network guarantees well performance of S 11 and NF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the techniques proposed to reduce the power consumption of LNAs, current-reuse is an effective method worth adopting. Many studies mentioned in references focus on power consumption reducing and noise improvement, such as current-reuse [1,2,3,4], gm-boosting [5] and using sub-threshold MOSFETs techniques [6]. However, the LNA and the mixer are two separated circuits, thus there is still room for improvement on power consumption and the chip area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially [9] has a much higher linearity at the cost of a high power consumption, which makes the receiver better suited for high performance applications. Additionally, it is clear that the low supply voltage of 0.25V used in [16] leads to a low 1dB compression point and low IIP3. The increased noise figure of the reported receiver can be explained by the absence of the LNA and the very low power consumption of the VCO.…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the reported FSK receivers, the WURxV2.1 has a low power consumption, especially taken into account that [12,13,16] do not have frequency calibration or an on-chip demodulator. Direct comparison in power consumption is difficult since also other parameters are different.…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%