A 5‐year evaluation of two glass‐ionomer cements used as fissure sealants

Pardi, Vanessa; Pereira, Antônio Carlos; Mialhe, Fábio Luiz; Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro; Ambrosano, Gláucia María Bovi

doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2003.00113.x

Cited by 46 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, other studies have indicated that, for the permanent teeth of children and adolescents, resinbased sealants are more effective than GIC at reducing caries at 24 to 44 months after implementation [11][12][13][14] . Thus, there is conflicting evidence as to whether GIC may reduce the prevalence of caries in children's permanent teeth 9,12,[15][16][17] . When molars are in an eruption process, moisture control is not possible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Haznedaroğlu

Güner

Duman

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the caries prevention effectiveness, retention rates and the level of fluoride of saliva of a glassionomer sealant (GIS) with that of a resin-based sealant (RS). Eighty GIS and 80RS were placed on the first permanent molars in 40 children aged 7-10 years. Children were re-examined at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after the procedure. Saliva samples were collected before the sealant was applied and again at each appointment, and fluoride levels were measured. After 48 months, occlusal caries were seen in 4 and 12 teeth in GIS and RS groups respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the fluoride levels of saliva between baseline and up to 12th month in GIS group. GISs presented effective prevention of caries development, even though the failure rate is higher when compared to the RSs. An increased salivary fluoride level due to GISs might be an additive effect on the prevention of dental caries.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Haznedaroğlu

Güner

Duman

et al. 2016

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As far as protection against secondary caries is concerned, no significant differences were observed between materials. A low retention index was obtained for Ketac GIC and Vitremer RMGIC after five years (57). The total retention index was less than 2% (1.6%) for both materials.…”

Section: Development Of Sealing Methods and Applied Materialsmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…Clinical studies showed low retention index for GICs used as sealants in observation periods from six months to seven years (73). Although a high percentage of sealant loss was observed , it was not directly related to development of caries (25,57,74,76). Examples of such sealants were: ASPA, Fuji III, Ketac Cem, Ketac Bond, Chemfil Superior.…”

Section: Development Of Sealing Methods and Applied Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sealing of Fissures on Masticatory Surfaces of Teeth as a Method for Caries Prophylaxis

Jodkowska¹

2012

Contemporary Approach to Dental Caries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The first permanent molars were cleaned with a pumice slurry in Robinson brushes, washed, etched with 37% phosphoric acid (15 seconds), washed (15 seconds) and air-dried. Under isolation with cotton rolls, the material was applied as follows 17 …”

Section: Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Application On the Occlumentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of caries risk on the retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer used as occlusal sealant: a clinical trial

Tagliaferro

Pardi

Ambrosano

et al. 2017

Rev. odontol. UNESP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoIntrodução: Pouco se sabe sobre a influência do risco de cárie na retenção de selantes oclusais. Objetivo: Avaliar as taxas de retenção de um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina utilizado como selante oclusal em primeiros molares permanentes de escolares de 6-8 anos, e analisar a influência do risco de cárie na taxa de retenção do selante, durante um período de 24 meses. Material e método: A aplicação do selante foi realizada em consultório odontológico no início do estudo, após as crianças serem alocados no grupo de alto risco (AR) ou baixo risco (BR) de cárie. Os exames foram realizados pelo mesmo dentista calibrado em 0, 6, 12, 18 e 24 meses. As taxas de retenção foram estimadas e o método de Kaplan-Meier foi utilizado para estimar as probabilidades de sobrevivência. A comparação entre os grupos AR e BR foi avaliada pelos testes de Wilcoxon e log-rank. Resultado: Os resultados mostraram que 14% dos dentes selados apresentaram perda total (16% para AR e 12% para BR) e 46% apresentaram perda parcial durante o estudo (51% de AR e 41% para BR), em relação a amostra no início do estudo. Nenhuma diferença pode ser demonstrada pela análise de sobrevivência entre os grupos AR e BR (p> 0,05). Conclusão: O risco de cárie não influenciou as taxas de retenção de um cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina usado como selante oclusal em escolares de 6-8 anos de idade.Descritores: Escolares; cárie; risco; análise de sobrevivência. AbstractIntroduction: Little is known whether caries risk influence occlusal sealants retention. Objective: To determine the retention rates (RR) of the resin-modified glass ionomer cement used as occlusal sealant in permanent first molars of 6-8-year old schoolchildren and to analyze the influence of caries risk at baseline on the RR of the sealant, over a 24-month period. Material and method: The sealant application was performed in a dental office at the beginning of the study, after children being allocated into high caries risk group (HR) and low caries risk group (LR). The examinations were performed by the same calibrated dentist at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Retention rates were estimated, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival probabilities; and the comparison between HR and LR groups was evaluated by Wilcoxon and log-rank test. Result: The results showed that 14% of sealed teeth showed total loss (16% for HR and 12% for LR) and 46% showed partial loss during the study (51% for HR and 41% for LR), in relation to the baseline sample. No difference could be demonstrated by the survival analysis between HR and LR groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Caries risk did not influence the retention rates of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used as occlusal sealant in 6-8-year old schoolchildren.

show abstract

A 5‐year evaluation of two glass‐ionomer cements used as fissure sealants

Abstract: Sealing pits and fissures with glass-ionomer cements was effective in preventing caries.

Cited by 46 publications

References 29 publications

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

A 48-month randomized controlled trial of caries prevention effect of a one-time application of glass ionomer sealant versus resin sealant

Sealing of Fissures on Masticatory Surfaces of Teeth as a Method for Caries Prophylaxis

Influence of caries risk on the retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer used as occlusal sealant: a clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About