DOI: 10.21007/etd.cghs.2011.0113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Behavioral and Anatomical Analysis of Conditioned Taste Aversion in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J Mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
(267 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has also been found that C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice respond equally to illness induced by LiCl, as evidenced by their similar c‐fos expression levels in the parabrachial nucleus, a brain region associated with learning unpleasant gustatory and visceral information. This data suggests that the strain differences in conditioned taste aversion are not simply due to DBA/2J mice experiencing more illness 48 . Note, however, that the aforementioned study evaluated c‐fos expression following LiCl consumption rather than intraperitoneal injection, so this may explain the lack of sensitivity in the c‐fos measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has also been found that C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice respond equally to illness induced by LiCl, as evidenced by their similar c‐fos expression levels in the parabrachial nucleus, a brain region associated with learning unpleasant gustatory and visceral information. This data suggests that the strain differences in conditioned taste aversion are not simply due to DBA/2J mice experiencing more illness 48 . Note, however, that the aforementioned study evaluated c‐fos expression following LiCl consumption rather than intraperitoneal injection, so this may explain the lack of sensitivity in the c‐fos measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This data suggests that the strain differences in conditioned taste aversion are not simply due to DBA/2J mice experiencing more illness. 48 Note, however, that the aforementioned study evaluated c‐fos expression following LiCl consumption rather than intraperitoneal injection, so this may explain the lack of sensitivity in the c‐fos measure. Whatever the source of these differences, our results are by and large in agreement with the preexisting literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%