ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Papers 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1576246.1531379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
570
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(586 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
570
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…11. We get good performances in the man, hand, dolphin and many other models provided by X. Chen et al [8]. They are decomposed to meaningful components without over-segmentation and remain good boundaries between each component.…”
Section: A Some Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…11. We get good performances in the man, hand, dolphin and many other models provided by X. Chen et al [8]. They are decomposed to meaningful components without over-segmentation and remain good boundaries between each component.…”
Section: A Some Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In this paper we chose to adopt the dataset and metrics proposed by Chen et al (2009). This choice was driven by three factors: the richness of the dataset in terms of number of meshes and categories, the presence of a ground-truth segmentation operated by a number of different individuals and, finally, the availability of a large set of results obtained by running most modern 3D mesh segmentation techniques with this benchmark.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess the results obtained by the proposed technique we first performed a set of quantitative experiments over the dataset presented by Chen et al (2009).…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations