A bibliographic study of public relations in Spanish media and communication journals, 2000–2012

González, María Isabel Míguez; Baamonde-Silva, Xosé Manuel; Valencia, Juan Manuel Corbacho

doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.08.002

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, we identified papers about communication (So, 1988;Paisley, 1989;Cáceres & Caffarel, 1993;Jones, 1997;Lauf, 2005;Lievrouw, 1990;Martínez Nicolás, 2009;Castillo & Carretón, 2010;Castillo & Rubio, 2010;Castillo-Esparcia et al, 2012;Roca-Correa & Pueyo-Ayhan, 2012;Martínez-Nicolás & SaperasLapiedra, 2016;Compte-Pujol et al, 2016) and also specific studies about public relations (Pasadeos & Renfro, 1989, 1992Sallot et al, 2003;Xifra & Castillo, 2006;Ki & Shin, 2006;Castillo & Xifra, 2006;Pasadeos et al, 2010;Fussell et al, 2013;Míguez et al, 2014;Kim et al, 2014;Marca et al, 2014;Míguez-González et al, 2016;among others Considering the academic prestige achieved by WoK and the WoS data base in recent times (Cope & Kalantzis, 2009: n/e), researchers of the five continents try to public their works in journals included in their data bases (McNutt, 2014), turning the platform into the most outstanding display that allows observing the main study object topics in every discipline and period, as well as its evolution through time and develop comparative studies.…”

Section: Bibliometrics Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategy and Public Relations: a Bibliometric Comparative Study

Compte-Pujol¹,

Matilla²,

Hernández³

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article presents a bibliometric study of journals specialized in public relations (PR) that were listed in the Social Sciences Citation Index-Communication-Journal List database and journals specialized in strategy management that were listed in the Social Sciences Citation IndexManagement-Journal List. Both lists owned by Thomson Reuters until October 2016. Articles referring to the concept of "strategy" in PR journals were identified through content analysis, as well as those articles that included the concept "public relations" in journals specialized in strategy management. Variables of analysis were: periods of time for publishing; gender of authors; prevalent number of authors per article; and titles of the articles. Results showed that strategy appeared widely treated in the journals specialized in PR, while PR had almost no presence in magazines specialized in strategy management.

show abstract

Section: Bibliometrics Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategy and Public Relations: a Bibliometric Comparative Study

Compte-Pujol¹,

Matilla²,

Hernández³

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los autores de género femenino son prevalentes en el conjunto de autorías de estas dos revistas (excepto en el último caso), en contradicción con Castillo & Carretón (2010: 310), quienes identificaron una supremacía de autorías masculinas en su estudio. Los datos tampoco son congruentes con la paridad de género de las revistas españolas estudiadas por Míguez, Baamonde & Corbacho (2014), excepto en el último caso, donde sí se cumple (PI7). Tampoco en esta ocasión es posible extraer conclusiones significativas sobre el género de los autores de las once (11) revistas especializadas en estrategia debido a los escasísimos volúmenes publicados (PI8), aunque destacamos que la autoría masculina es total.…”

Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified

“…Así, se han identificado artículos sobre comunicación (So, 1988;Paisley, 1989;Cáceres & Caffarel, 1993;Jones, 1997;Lauf, 2005;Lievrouw, 1990;Martínez Nicolás, 2009;Castillo & Carretón, 2010;Castillo & Rubio, 2010;Castillo-Esparcia et al, 2012;Roca-Correa & Pueyo-Ayhan, 2012;Martínez-Nicolás & Saperas-Lapiedra, 2016;Compte-Pujol et al, 2016) y también estudios específicos sobre relaciones públicas (Pasadeos & Renfro, 1989, 1992Sallot et al, 2003;Xifra & Castillo, 2006;Ki & Shin, 2006;Castillo & Xifra, 2006;Pasadeos et al, 2010;Fussell et al, 2013;Míguez et al, 2014;Kim et al, 2014;Marca et al, 2014;Míguez-González et al, 2016; entre otros).…”

unclassified

Estrategia y Relaciones Públicas: un estudio bibliométrico comparativo

Compte-Pujol¹,

Matilla²,

Hernández³

2018

RLCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo presenta un estudio bibliométrico de las revistas de relaciones públicas catalogadas en las bases de datos Social Sciences Citation Index–Communication–Journal List y de las de estrategia del Social Sciences Citation Index–Management–Journal List, ambas propiedades de Thomson Reuters hasta octubre de 2016. Mediante análisis de contenidos se identifican los artículos que tratan la estrategia en las revistas especializadas en relaciones públicas y al revés: las especializadas en estrategia que contemplan las relaciones públicas en sus contenidos. Las variables de análisis fueron los periodos temporales en que se habían publicado mayor número de artículos; cuestiones de género sobre los autores de los artículos analizados; número prevalente de autores por artículo; y los títulos de los artículos. Los resultados revelan que la estrategia aparece ampliamente tratada en las revistas de relaciones públicas, mientras que las relaciones públicas tienen presencia casi nula en las revistas de gestiónespecializadas en estrategia.

show abstract

“…Bibliometric analysis enables researchers to show publishing patterns as it finds out the stream of knowledge and the development of literature in a specific discipline. In the field of public relations, bibliometric analysis of public relations journals (Ki, Pasadeos, & Ertem-Eray, 2019;Pujol, Matilla, & Hernandez, 2018) female authors (Balta Peltekoğlu, & Tozlu, 2018), Habermasian theory in public relations (Buhmann, Ihlen, & Stockdale, 2019) influential authors and works in the field (Pasadeos, Renfro, & Hanily, 1999) dialogue (Morehouse, & Saffer, 2018) and public relations in Spanish media (Miguez-Gonzalez, Baamonde-Silva, & Corbacho-Valencia, 2014) have been researched bibliometrically. In this context, as public relations models refer to the reflection of the practice, the central focus of this paper is to analyse the models bibliometrically.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Relations Models

Demir¹,

Sümer²,

Karakaya³

2020

CONNECTIST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study is to reveal the trends in the field of public relations by examining the topic of 'public relations models' in order to capture the variation in public relations practice. Bibliometric analysis has been chosen as the methodology in this study to show publishing patterns as it finds out the stream of knowledge and the development of literature in a specific discipline. Data used in this research were collected from Thomson Reuters Web of Science Database. By selecting the topic of 'public relations model' in the search button, 595 studies were investigated within the context of institution and country collaboration, cocitation network analysis, co-word network analysis and citation burst. In order to perform these network analyses, the CiteSpace II software package has been used. The findings suggest that the USA as a country, universities in the USA as institutions and academics from the USA as author collaboration are found to be the top ranked items by centrality on the topic of public relations models. Grunig and Grunig's (2002) paper on public relations and communication models is found to have the strongest citation burst as expected. The most investigated research topics are global flux, the blog-mediated crisis communication model, and stakeholder relationship.

show abstract

A bibliographic study of public relations in Spanish media and communication journals, 2000–2012

Cited by 16 publications

References 16 publications

Strategy and Public Relations: a Bibliometric Comparative Study

Strategy and Public Relations: a Bibliometric Comparative Study

Estrategia y Relaciones Públicas: un estudio bibliométrico comparativo

A Bibliometric Analysis of Public Relations Models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About