2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
1
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
131
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform the analysis, the following configuration in SciMAT was established: word as the unit of analysis, co-occurrence analysis as the tool to build the networks, equivalence index as the similarity measure to normalize the networks, Jaccard index as the evolution measure, Inclusion index as the overlapping measure, the H-Index to detect the relevance, and the simple centers algorithm as the clustering algorithm to detect the clusters (Castillo-Vergara et al 2018). The analysis provides an evaluation map for the topic "customer loyalty and brand management" with the most occurring words and their relevance in the publications analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform the analysis, the following configuration in SciMAT was established: word as the unit of analysis, co-occurrence analysis as the tool to build the networks, equivalence index as the similarity measure to normalize the networks, Jaccard index as the evolution measure, Inclusion index as the overlapping measure, the H-Index to detect the relevance, and the simple centers algorithm as the clustering algorithm to detect the clusters (Castillo-Vergara et al 2018). The analysis provides an evaluation map for the topic "customer loyalty and brand management" with the most occurring words and their relevance in the publications analyzed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific to the interdisciplinary knowledge domain that CIM is subscribed to, bibliometric methods offer a viable way to synthesize and map heterogeneous research (Uddin, Khan, & Baur, 2015). Multiple topic-specific bibliometric studies are concerned with creativity (e.g., Castillo-Vergara, Alvarez-Marin, & Placencio-Hidalgo, 2018;Williams, Runco, & Berlow, 2016), innovation (e.g., Fagerberg, Fosaas, & Sapprasert, 2012;Shafique, 2013) or entrepreneurship (e.g., Landström, Harirchi, & Åström, 2012;Xu, Chen, Fung, & Chan, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This methodology has been successfully used in recent research [56,57] and generates useful information for researchers evaluating scientific activity. Two previous bibliometric articles about gentrification and bibliometric studies were found on WOS [58,59], neither of which focus on environmental science.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%