2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 378 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
2
171
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the interquartile range (IR) as a measure of dispersion of the data, so the first and third quartile of data is calculated. High values specify that there is no consensus between the respondents in relation to the true value that that item should have but if the value is low, it specifies a consensus on its value [48]. The median is also used as a measure of central tendency and high values indicate that the respondents consider that item to be very important, while low values specify that the item is not very important to them [49].…”
Section: Phase 4 Characterization Of the Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the interquartile range (IR) as a measure of dispersion of the data, so the first and third quartile of data is calculated. High values specify that there is no consensus between the respondents in relation to the true value that that item should have but if the value is low, it specifies a consensus on its value [48]. The median is also used as a measure of central tendency and high values indicate that the respondents consider that item to be very important, while low values specify that the item is not very important to them [49].…”
Section: Phase 4 Characterization Of the Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than half a century has attracted researchers' attention to solving a diversity of problems in various fields of knowledge. Numerous publications have reported their applications in the most diverse methods that comprise their universe of study, for example: [10][11][12][13]. According Govindan et al [2] and Mendoza et al [9] several classifications of MCDA methods have been proposed in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According Zyoud et al [11] among the most common MCDA methods, there are: analytic hierarchy process (AHP), multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT), simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART), fuzzy set theory (FST), data envelopment analysis (DEA), case-based reasoning (CBR), simple additive weighting (SAW), elimination et choice translating reality (ELECTRE), technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), preference ranking and organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE), and goal programming (GP) [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) allows decision-makers to face complex decision-making situations involving multiple, usually conflicting decision criteria, which include quantitative and/or qualitative aspects in a decision-making process. AHP method takes a significant place during selection of MCDM techniques for supplier evaluation and selection [8]. Critics of this method indicate that significance of elements presents only some sort of arithmetic accuracy that does not reflect real or objective evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%