2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.10.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bilateral exchange model: The paradox of quantifying the linguistic values of qualitative characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their contributions are developed at a more formal level and generally follow a fuzzy environment approach to account for the frictions caused by the uncertainty. See, among others, Aliev et al [3,4], Di Caprio et al [15] and Tavana et al [44].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Their contributions are developed at a more formal level and generally follow a fuzzy environment approach to account for the frictions caused by the uncertainty. See, among others, Aliev et al [3,4], Di Caprio et al [15] and Tavana et al [44].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Tavana et al [44] propose a theoretical model where each DM is endowed with a product. The DMs are aware of the fact that they do not perceive the characteristics of the products in the same way and define their beliefs based on these differences in perception.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…--Fuzzy linguistic scales These scales are frequently considered for different goals as an a posteriori tool to encode data from a discrete (often a Likert) scale by means of fuzzy numbers (see, for instance, Zadeh 1975a, b, c;Tong and Bonissone 1980;Pedrycz 1989;Herrera et al 1998Herrera et al , 2008Lalla et al 2008;Li 2013;Akdag et al 2014;Estrella et al 2014;Massanet et al 2014;Tejeda-Lorente et al 2014Villacorta et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Garcia-Galán et al 2015;Liu et al 2015a;Tavana et al 2015). --Fuzzy rating scale This scale has been introduced by Hesketh et al (1988).…”
Section: Fuzzy Data: Fuzzy Representation Of Linguistic Terms Ordinamentioning
confidence: 99%