2013
DOI: 10.1108/17410401311329625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bottom‐up approach for productivity measurement and improvement

Abstract: Purpose -The steady incline in oil prices combined with the recent credit crisis and downturns in financial markets has driven organizations to re-evaluate their manufacturing processes and bottom line. The purpose of this paper is to suggest a bottom-up approach that may be used by firms in planning, managing and forecasting productivity improvements. Design/methodology/approach -A multiple-case study approach was used: two comprehensive cases and seven short cases were used to illustrate the model. Findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i) All the frameworks above were prone to top-down approach except what proposed by Jagoda et al (2013). The improvement activities were mainly initiated from management level and carried out in project-based by improvement teams, usually with small number of participants involved.…”
Section: Discussion Of Shortfalls In the Lean Implementation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…i) All the frameworks above were prone to top-down approach except what proposed by Jagoda et al (2013). The improvement activities were mainly initiated from management level and carried out in project-based by improvement teams, usually with small number of participants involved.…”
Section: Discussion Of Shortfalls In the Lean Implementation Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual framework proposed by Jagoda et al (2013) aims to improve productivity continuously, particularly via bottom-up approach. There are five macro implementation elements with three critical inner steps within each element.…”
Section: Description Of the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These roadmaps are designed for lean transformation in different countries such as USA, India, Malaysia… In each country, there should be modifications for suitable adaptions to the contexts. In this study, for the context of Vietnamese manufacturing companies, a roadmap is proposed based on the recent studies such as: and Jagoda, Lonseth & Lonseth (2013). This proposed roadmap is utilized to ask the experts and managers (of Vietnamese successful lean companies) to modify phases and tools in the roadmap and create an appropriate lean roadmap for Vietnamese firms.…”
Section: Lean Roadmap With Tools and Methods Used For Lean Transformamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, organisations had adopted performance management systems in order to improve their employee's productivity through various incentives. Amongst all other factors, performance management systems had been viewed as a catalyst for increasing employees' productivity in organisations (Jagoda, Lonseth & Lonseth, 2013).…”
Section: The Background To the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance appraisal can be used by organisations as a tool for setting up employee performance standards as well as expectations. Additionally, the performance management system is also of paramount significance for organisations in identifying possible strengths and weaknesses of employees across all departments (Jagoda, Lonseth & Lonseth, 2013). Moreover, the use of standardised performance management system would allow organisations to have knowledge about the organisation's strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities in their human capital (Lambert, 2009).…”
Section: Concepts Of Performance Management Systems and Employee Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%