A brewery in a foundry, a winery in a strip mall: adaptive reuse by food enterprises

Jones, John Chris; Franck, Karen A.

doi:10.1057/s41289-019-00085-7

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Their high-performance score indicates that this component is active in local food promotion across the US, but for a more niche audience. While breweries may strike the reader as an odd component to include, focus group interviews and other studies have identified brewing/distilling venues as associated with restaurants and other local food businesses, as well as important to tourism-based place promotion (Argent, 2018;Bradley, Maples, Lewis, & Berend, 2017;Iizuka & Kikuchi, 2016;Jones & Franck, 2019;Thomas Lane et al, 2016). Another area of high awareness is components related to product characteristics -price, diversity, and labels.…”

Section: How Well Do Specific Local Food System Components Function?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Resident perspectives on local food system performance and development priorities: A pilot analysis of the local food vitality index

Rossi

Woods

Davis

2020

Local Development & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: How Well Do Specific Local Food System Components Function?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Resident perspectives on local food system performance and development priorities: A pilot analysis of the local food vitality index

Rossi

Woods

Davis

2020

Local Development & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Breathing new life into abandoned buildings craft breweries occupy old churches, fire stations, hardware stores, warehouses, etc. (Feeney, 2017; Jones & Franck, 2019; Reid et al., 2019). They have also been key contributors in the regeneration of economically depressed neighborhoods and distressed downtowns (Reid, 2018; Weiler, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Craft breweries and residential property values

Zhou,

Reid,

Carroll

2024

Growth and Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper studies the effect of craft breweries on residential property values. Using a hedonic Difference‐in‐Differences (DID) approach and about 250 thousand housing transactions in Denver, Colorado from 1990 to 2016, we investigate the impact of proximity to a craft brewery on residential property values. We consider three types of residence (single‐family home, row house, and condominiums), three types of brewery (all craft breweries, microbreweries, and brewpubs/taprooms), and two measurements of distance (Euclidian and walk‐time). Our most robust results are found for single‐family homes, whose values enjoy a premium of up to 20.4% for being in proximity to a brewpub/taproom several years after, with the average annual maximum premium around 3%. As expected, premiums decline as distance from breweries increase. Beyond a distance of 0.5 km or a 10‐min walk‐time, the premium for a regional/microbrewery is greater than that for a brewpub/taproom. For single family homes within 4 km or 40‐min walk‐time, the annualized premium ranges between 0.41% and 3.01%. These findings support the narrative that craft breweries are a neighborhood asset.

show abstract

“…In recent years increased interest in the academic literature has been directed to address this topic, with studies identifying how different urban farming techniques can be integrated with urban residual flows and infrastructure; see, e.g., Mohareb et al (2017), Chance et al (2018), Marchi et al (2018), Sanjuan-Delmás et al (2018), Gentry (2019), , and Dorr et al (2021). However, the literature is abundant with examples of integration with urban systems by employing vacant plots for urban gardening and rooftop greenhouses (Thomaier et al, 2014;Goldstein et al, 2016;Dorr et al, 2017;Sanjuan-Delmás et al, 2018;Jones and Franck, 2019;Orsini et al, 2020;Pulighe and Lupia, 2020). Despite their prevalence, such examples are scarce in the context of Northern Europe, the focus in this article, and few examples have been highlighted for the integration of urban vertical farming and urban residuals (Chance et al, 2018;.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimating the Potential of Building Integration and Regional Synergies to Improve the Environmental Performance of Urban Vertical Farming

Martin¹,

Weidner²,

Gullström³

2022

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vertical farms have expanded rapidly in urban areas to support food system resilience. However, many of these systems source a substantial share of their material and energy requirements outside their urban environments. As urban areas produce significant shares of residual material and energy streams, there is considerable potential to explore the utilization of these streams for urban agriculture in addition to the possibility of employing underutilized urban spaces in residential and commercial buildings. This study aims to explore and assess the potential for developing more circular vertical farming systems which integrate with buildings and utilize residual material and energy streams. We focus on the symbiotic development of a hypothetical urban farm located in the basement of a residential building in Stockholm. Life cycle assessment is used to quantify the environmental performance of synergies related to energy integration and circular material use. Energy-related scenarios include the integration of the farm's waste heat with the host building's heating system and the utilization of solar PV. Circular material synergies include growing media and fertilizers based on residual materials from a local brewery and biogas plant. Finally, a local pick-up system is studied to reduce transportation. The results point to large benefits from integrating the urban farm with the building energy system, reducing the vertical farm's GHG emissions up to 40%. Synergies with the brewery also result in GHG emissions reductions of roughly 20%. No significant change in the environmental impacts was found from the use of solar energy, while the local pick-up system reduces environmental impacts from logistics, although this does not substantially lower the overall environmental impacts. However, there are some trade-offs where scenarios with added infrastructure can also increase material and water resource depletion. The results from the synergies reviewed suggest that proximity and host-building synergies can improve the material and energy efficiency of urban vertical farms. The results provide insights to residential building owners on the benefits of employing residual space for urban food provisioning and knowledge to expand the use of vertical farming and circular economy principles in an urban context.

show abstract

A brewery in a foundry, a winery in a strip mall: adaptive reuse by food enterprises

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

Resident perspectives on local food system performance and development priorities: A pilot analysis of the local food vitality index

Resident perspectives on local food system performance and development priorities: A pilot analysis of the local food vitality index

Craft breweries and residential property values

Estimating the Potential of Building Integration and Regional Synergies to Improve the Environmental Performance of Urban Vertical Farming

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About