2016
DOI: 10.7275/yq7r-4820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Guide to Decisions at Each Step of the Propensity Score Matching Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed PSM analysis using eight matching covariates known to influence either the exposure or the outcome, or both based on the unconfoundedness assumption. [19][20][21] We computed propensity scores in a logit model by fitting comprehensive knowledge of HIV as a function of the matching covariates. We assessed the initial balance in propensity scores using a back-to-back histogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We performed PSM analysis using eight matching covariates known to influence either the exposure or the outcome, or both based on the unconfoundedness assumption. [19][20][21] We computed propensity scores in a logit model by fitting comprehensive knowledge of HIV as a function of the matching covariates. We assessed the initial balance in propensity scores using a back-to-back histogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed the initial balance in propensity scores using a back-to-back histogram. 22 We then matched participants with and without compressive knowledge of HIV on similar propensity scores 23 using different matching approaches, namely nearest neighbour matching with and without calliper adjustment, 20 and optimal pair and optimal full matching. 21 A calliper is a distance within which matching occurs, computed as 20% of the SD of the propensity score to prevent bias from distant matches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, is the number of cases in the comparison group for the ith treated case. Practically, to estimate the ATET in Stata version 17.0, the study adopted the standard procedure, concisely presented by Harris and Horst (2016). Particularly, the logistic regression was used for calculating propensity scores (p-scores) while picking as many covariates to be used in the model as possible.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential threat to validity to this strongly ignorable treatment assumption is when the balancing property is not attained between the groups for the variables. Given the importance of this assumption, both numerical and visual balance tests were adopted in this study to obtain the highest quality matches (Harris & Horst, 2016;Stuart, 2010). With this commonly used matching technique, computation of the ATT was then restricted to the region of common support.…”
Section: Analytical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting the covariates to be used in the model is the first stage in applying the PSM. It is vital to incorporate variables related to self-selection and traits present at the beginning of the intervention (Harris & Horst, 2016). The study looked at the variables that influenced households' participation in the program.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%