Biological Systematics 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781003130178-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Brief Introduction to Systematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its taxonomic scope remained relatively stable over time. Gromov & Polyakov (1977) also included Dinaromys (now in Arvicolini) in this tribe and some authors classified Clethrionomyini as a subtribe of Arvicolini (Pavlinov & Rossolimo 1987) or Prometheomyini (Pavlinov et al 1995, Pavlinov & Rossolimo 1998. Kretzoi (1969a) proposed Myodini as a replacement name for Clethrionomyini but this violates Article 40.1. of the Code and is considered invalid.…”
Section: Tribe: Clethrionomyini Hooper and Hart 1962mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Its taxonomic scope remained relatively stable over time. Gromov & Polyakov (1977) also included Dinaromys (now in Arvicolini) in this tribe and some authors classified Clethrionomyini as a subtribe of Arvicolini (Pavlinov & Rossolimo 1987) or Prometheomyini (Pavlinov et al 1995, Pavlinov & Rossolimo 1998. Kretzoi (1969a) proposed Myodini as a replacement name for Clethrionomyini but this violates Article 40.1. of the Code and is considered invalid.…”
Section: Tribe: Clethrionomyini Hooper and Hart 1962mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomy. The majority of authorities accepted amurensis as a species in its own right, usually with the inclusion of ognevi (Corbet 1978, Pavlinov & Rossolimo 1987. In the opinion of some authors, amurensis also includes chrysogaster (Pavlinov & Lissovsky 2012), novosibiricus and part of chrysogaster (Musser & Carleton 2005); still others synonymised amurensis with sibiricus s.lat.…”
Section: Vinogradov 1924mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations