A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence in type 2 diabetes

Estelle, F.; Roche, B.; Izaute, Marie; Batisse, M.; Tauveron, Igor; Chakroun, N.

doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2013.05.003

Cited by 19 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We found that DSME based individual program was conducted into 40.9% of the studies (12,13,16,20,23,25,29,30,32) and 59.1% of the studies offered the DSME in a combination of individual and group education (12,14,15,17,20,21,27,31,32,34) . In general, The individual or group-based program provided the intervention of several strategies, including personalized counseling, feedback regarding goal-setting and problem-solving, support for self-care practice from family members, and the follow-up session.…”

Section: Diabetes Mellitus Self-management Education (Dsme)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five review studies explained that patients who have higher perceived support are significantly better self-efficacy (12,14,16,20,24) . One study received the one-on-one tailored education session and bi-weekly follow-up to influence the self-efficacy on performing self-management (32) .…”

Section: Self-efficacymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Emotional distress associated with poor diabetes self-care and glycemic control which impacted to emotional responses, including feeling discouraged of diabetes treatment, worrying of long-term complications, and incorrectly defining the concrete of goals for diabetes cared (41) . From those existing studies, twelve studies addressed the psychological status as the intermediate outcomes, which reported that higher level of family support has a positive impact on reducing depressive symptoms (13,15,22,26) and positive emotional control (16) , psychosocial well-being (19,31,34) , quality of life (26,32) and diabetes related to distress and reducing barriers (17) . As the results, less depression has positive impacts on self-care behavior and certain clinical outcomes…”

Section: Psychological Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies were noticed to follow-up the program by using the telephone method (13,14,25,26,32) . Mix of telephone and face-to-face follow-up strategies (18)(19)(20)29) and two studies did not mention about the follow-up process for evaluating the program (16,21) …”

Section: Follow-up Strategiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies used food model, picture, illustration, foot picture (14,18,20,24) . Diabetes handout/booklet (diet, exercise, medication, eye, and foot self-care) been used to spread the knowledge (15,16,19,21,30,32,36) . In addition, four studies (13,14,20,34) used video and DVD to show the successfully of self-care behaviors practice among diabetes patients.…”

Section: Education Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review: Family Support Integrated To Diabetes Self-Management among Glycemic Uncontrolled Type II DM Patients

Pamungkas¹,

Chamroonsawasdi²,

Vatanasomcoon³

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Background: Diabetes mellitus is dramatically increasing in the wide world. The managing of diabetes care emphasized the self-management education and support into patients' care and family care.Objective: to review and synthesizes the effectiveness of DSME strategies involving family as a key person to provide social support for diabetes mellitus self-management of glycemic uncontrolled patients Method: Three databases through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus were reviewed to assess the relevant articles. The following search terms: "type 2 diabetes," "self-management," "family support," and "glycemic uncontrolled." We summarized details of family support on self-management among glycemic uncontrolled patients for 14 existing studies.Results: A total of 22 intervention studies were identified. Those studies have a heterogeneous of the education strategies, support perceived, follow-ups strategies and outcomes among type 2 DM. Family integration on diabetes self-management education (DSME) has a positive impact on several outcomes including, self-care behaviors, psychological outcomes, self-efficacy and clinical outcomes Conclusions: This systematic review found robust data related to the integration of family support on diabetes self-management among glycemic uncontrolled patients. Consequently, the improvement in outcomes was identified. Implications:The findings suggest model of family engagement is better and needed for sustaining the diabetes care in the long-term care

show abstract