2008
DOI: 10.21500/20112084.919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A call to arms: time to do cognitive science in Latin America

Abstract: Previous theoretical reviews about the development of Psychology in Latin America suggest that Latin American psychology has a promising future. This paper empirically checks whether that status remains justified. In so doing, the frequency of programs/research domains in three salient psychological areas is assessed in Latin America and in two other regions of the world. A chi-square statistic is used to analyse the collected data. Programs/research domains and regions of the world are the independent variabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This author proposes that a review start with a specific question, use strategies for choosing the material, use standardized methods to evaluate material, conduct a systematic and selective synthesis that justifies the findings, and gives clear indications of the gaps of knowledge and future strategies (Mulrow, 1987). Finally, I think that some reviews which adapt better to these criteria are that by Robins, Gosling, and Craik (1999) when they analyzed trends in psychology, the fact that this work fostered a heated discussion, partly confirms the appropriateness of the methodology used, and that by Marmolejo- Ramos (2008), when he analyzed the state of cognitive science in Latin America, published it in this journal.…”
Section: Fernando Juárezmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This author proposes that a review start with a specific question, use strategies for choosing the material, use standardized methods to evaluate material, conduct a systematic and selective synthesis that justifies the findings, and gives clear indications of the gaps of knowledge and future strategies (Mulrow, 1987). Finally, I think that some reviews which adapt better to these criteria are that by Robins, Gosling, and Craik (1999) when they analyzed trends in psychology, the fact that this work fostered a heated discussion, partly confirms the appropriateness of the methodology used, and that by Marmolejo- Ramos (2008), when he analyzed the state of cognitive science in Latin America, published it in this journal.…”
Section: Fernando Juárezmentioning
confidence: 73%