A Case Report ofFirst In mester Spontaneous Uterine Scar Rupture

Surve, Meenakshi; Pawar, Shashikant; Panigrahi, Patit Paban

doi:10.15713/ins.mmj.19

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The prevalence of recurrence based in these series suggests being within a wide range of approximately 0%-33% [8 , 9] . Although the presence of a previous uterine scar been described as the main cause of uterine rupture [10 , 11] , some recent studies suggesting the abnormal placental accreta syndrome being the most common underlying etiology [12] . Uterine rupture is even present in early gestations in the absence of any risk factors or an underlying medical cause.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recurrence of a second trimester fundal uterine rupture at the old scar site: A case report

Panesar¹,

Patel²,

Dhaliwal³

2022

Radiology Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recurrence of a second trimester fundal uterine rupture at the old scar site: A case report

Panesar¹,

Patel²,

Dhaliwal³

2022

Radiology Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review

Cecchini

Tassi

Londero

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim is to report a case of spontaneous uterine rupture in the first trimester of pregnancy and to review the literature on the topic. Methods: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Relevant English articles were identified without any time or study limitations. The data were aggregated, and a summary statistic was calculated. Results: A 35-year-old gravida 5, para 2 was admitted at our department because of fainting and abdominal pain. The woman had a first-trimester twin pregnancy and a history of two previous cesarean sections (CSs). Suspecting a uterine rupture, an emergency laparotomy was performed. The two sacs were completely removed, and the uterine rupture site was closed with a double-layer suture. The patient was discharged from hospital four days later in good condition. On the basis of this experience, a total of 76 case reports were extracted from PubMed and included in the review. Fifty-three patients out of 76 (69.74%) underwent previous surgery on the uterus. Most women (67.92%) had a CS, and in this group a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) or a placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorder was found to be the etiology in 77.78% of cases. Furthermore, 35.85% of the women had hysterectomy after uterine rupture. Twenty-three patients out of 76 (30.26%) had an unscarred uterus. Of this group, most women presented a uterine anomaly (43.48%). Moreover, 17.39% of these women had a hysterectomy. Conclusion: According to the literature, the current pandemic use of CS explains most cases of first-trimester uterine rupture.

show abstract

A Case Report ofFirst In mester Spontaneous Uterine Scar Rupture

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Recurrence of a second trimester fundal uterine rupture at the old scar site: A case report

Recurrence of a second trimester fundal uterine rupture at the old scar site: A case report

First Trimester Uterine Rupture: A Case Report and Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About