2015
DOI: 10.1142/s2047684115500074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CFD technique to investigate the chocked flow and heat transfer characteristic in a micro-channel heat sink

Abstract: In this research, a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique was used to investigate the effect of choking on the flow and heat transfer characteristics of a typical micro-channel heat sink. Numerical simulations have been carried out using Spalart-Allmaras model. Comparison of the numerical results for the heat transfer rate, mass flow rate and Stanton number with the experimental data were conducted. Relatively good agreement was achieved with maximum relative error 16%, and 8% for heat transfer and mass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average error between the model calculation and experimental results during the entire measuring period (from 10 January to 13 January) is AE15.6%, which is within an acceptable range in engineering applications. 42,43 Figure 3 indicates that the experimental results are in good agreement with the calculated values of the ratio model, verifying the rationality and the veracity of the proposed model. The minimum average error between calculated values and measured values in the ratio of heat transfer on 13 January is AE4.5%.…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The average error between the model calculation and experimental results during the entire measuring period (from 10 January to 13 January) is AE15.6%, which is within an acceptable range in engineering applications. 42,43 Figure 3 indicates that the experimental results are in good agreement with the calculated values of the ratio model, verifying the rationality and the veracity of the proposed model. The minimum average error between calculated values and measured values in the ratio of heat transfer on 13 January is AE4.5%.…”
Section: Validationsupporting
confidence: 60%