A Change Management Perspective on BIM-FM Implementation

Jupp, Julie; Awad, Ramsey

doi:10.29007/1tln

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Consistent with these findings, Jupp and Awad (2017) identify challenges of transitioning from traditional to BIM-based processes as a barrier to implementation. These management shortcomings were also identified by Jupp (2013) stating that the integration and management of processes, technologies and protocols across building lifecycle phases continues to present major challenges to its implementation.…”

supporting

confidence: 59%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Business value of integrated BIM-based asset management

Munir

Kiviniemi

Jones

2019

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Currently, building information modelling (BIM) is largely seen as a 3D model, not as an information model or information management tool. This wrong perception of BIM and low interest in 3D asset management (AM) is one of the major reasons for the slow adoption by clients in the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. The purpose of this paper is to identify the techniques and strategies of streamlining AM systems for BIM-based integration, and how the information is captured from physical assets towards BIM-based integration for clients to derive value from BIM investments. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative case study strategy was used to study the strategic implementation process of integrating BIM with AM systems and the business value of BIM in AM by a large asset owner in the UK. Findings The paper identifies key strategies in the adoption of BIM-based processes by an asset owner, the implementation process, the challenges and the benefits attained. Several barriers were identified as the challenges of adopting BIM-based processes in AM: complexity and cost associated with BIM; irrelevance of 3D geometric data in AM processes; nature of asset ownership structure; managing the asset handover process; managing change within the organisation. Organisations will have to consider the following issues in streaming asset information with BIM: the development for a clear strategy prior to adoption; connecting the strategy to the business goals; and conducting the discovery exercise to identify organisational information needs. Originality/value The research addresses a significant gap in the development of techniques and strategies for asset owners to streamline BIM with AM systems and derive business value from such integration. The research context is a case study involving a large owner-operator in the UK that has been able to derive value from BIM systems in their AM processes. The key value of the paper is improving asset owners’ understanding of BIM in AM by demonstrating the implementation strategies, linkage to organisational objectives, challenges, value management process and business value of BIM in AM. Another contribution of the paper is improving the understanding of BIM, which is usually viewed as 3D models and that 3D geometric data do not have much value for AM tasks.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 59%

“…Due to the technological and organisational changes involved, proactive change management is required for asset owners transitioning from traditional AM systems to one supported by BIM ( Jupp and Awad, 2017). The transition is usually constrained by the lack of consistent approaches.…”

Section: Bim Change Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business value of integrated BIM-based asset management

Munir

Kiviniemi

Jones

2019

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lastly, the specification of OIR and AIR poses challenges for asset management companies due to unclear role of BIM in supporting their core activities (Hadjidemetriou et al, 2023). The conjunction of these factors hinders BIM or BIM/GIS adoption, with the risk to implement an ineffective change management from traditional to BIM-based AM (Jupp & Awad, 2017) thus nullifying the benefits of BIM adoption and resources invested (Dixit et al, 2019).…”

Section: Asset Management and Bim/gis Integration For Infrastructuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Framework for Railway Network Assets Management Based on BIM/GIS Integration

Mangia,

Di Biccari,

Roupé

2023

CONVR 2023 - Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complex infrastructures such as railway networks face increasing challenges related to resource allocation, external events, constraints, and demands. Therefore, it is crucial to optimize the Asset Management (AM) phase to ensure the value and functionality of the assets. The integration of Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) can support this phase, but it can only yield benefits with a comprehensive approach that considers and addresses the specific needs and resources of the assets and their AM organization. The main benefits include improved data management, manipulation, information visualization and optimized resource allocation. This study describes an intermediate step towards developing a BIM/GIS integration framework for AM that can guide both researchers and practitioners. The framework aims to bridge theory and practice by incorporating insights from literature reviews and case studies. Its main objectives are to provide a comprehensive multi-stakeholder view and methods for effectively integrating BIM and GIS in this context. To develop the framework, the study employed focus groups, interviews, and practical BIM/GIS tests, which provided insights reported in this article. Furthermore, the study provides research directions for effective BIM/GIS integration in infrastructure AM

show abstract

“…These socio-technical factors have impacted the adoption of BIM during asset operations. However, Jupp and Awad (2017) suggested a change management strategy for operational teams that supports the integration of BIM during asset operations. Moreover, leadership in owner-operator organisations is crucial to guide and inspire management and operational teams to collaborate and maximise the benefits of BIM implementation (Sanchez et al , 2016).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

BIM business value for asset owners: key issues and challenges

Munir

Kiviniemi

Jones

et al. 2020

IJBPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThere is a need to develop the understanding of asset owners concerning the constraints of building information modelling (BIM) implementation, and its subsequent value realisation activities in asset management (AM) cannot be overstated. This is because the life cycle cost of a built asset is three times more than construction costs and five times more than the initial investment outlays. Hence, this paper investigated and identified the key issues and challenges of realising BIM business value in AM.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted an explorative and deductive approach. A qualitative four-stage research design strategy was adopted using 10 semi-structured interviews and document analysis to collect data. These were analysed through qualitative thematic analysis.FindingsThe study identified 15 key barriers and classified them from the perspective BIM governance dimensions, namely people, process and technology. Furthermore, the study identified that more process-based challenges are experienced than people or technology. Of the identified challenges, three are people-related, eight are process-related and four are technology-related.Practical implicationsThe analysed results focussed on the development of the understanding of asset owners, policymakers and researchers regarding the complex challenges that hinder BIM utilisation and value realisation in AM. The findings of this paper support progress towards enhanced BIM adoption in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry by highlighting the significance of the identified challenges, their nature (people-, process- or technology-based) and the resultant effect on BIM business value realisation during asset operations.Originality/valueThe original contribution of this study was the exploration and identification of the current challenges experienced by asset owners in implementing BIM during asset operations and how these affect the derivation of BIM business value.

show abstract

A Change Management Perspective on BIM-FM Implementation

Cited by 6 publications

References 11 publications

Business value of integrated BIM-based asset management

Business value of integrated BIM-based asset management

Towards a Framework for Railway Network Assets Management Based on BIM/GIS Integration

BIM business value for asset owners: key issues and challenges

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About