2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Chebyshev-based rectangular-polar integral solver for scattering by geometries described by non-overlapping patches

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is the case for wave scattering problems in acoustics and electromagnetics, 6,7 the boundary integral equation methods in elasticity require discretization of domains of lower dimensionality than those required by volumetric discretization methods (such as finite difference or finite element methods 4,8 ). These equations can generally be treated effectively even for high frequencies 9‐12 . As is well known, however, the classical boundary integral equations for open surfaces (or, in two dimensions, open arcs) are not second‐kind Fredholm integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As is the case for wave scattering problems in acoustics and electromagnetics, 6,7 the boundary integral equation methods in elasticity require discretization of domains of lower dimensionality than those required by volumetric discretization methods (such as finite difference or finite element methods 4,8 ). These equations can generally be treated effectively even for high frequencies 9‐12 . As is well known, however, the classical boundary integral equations for open surfaces (or, in two dimensions, open arcs) are not second‐kind Fredholm integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations can generally be treated effectively even for high frequencies. [9][10][11][12] As is well known, however, the classical boundary integral equations for open surfaces (or, in two dimensions, open arcs) are not second-kind Fredholm integral equations. This setting presents some difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…associated with the WGF method for the solution of the Dirichlet and Neumann problems. For the numerical implementation in 3D, in turn, we utilize the methods presented in [12,17].…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall proposed procedure thus reduces the operator evaluation problem to evaluation of weakly singular operators and tangential differentiation of surface densities. The weakly-singular integration problem is tackled in this paper by means of the Chebyshev-based rectangular-polar discretization methodology introduced recently [12,17]-which can be readily applied in conjunction with geometry descriptions given by a set of non-overlapping logically-quadrilateral patches, and which, therefore, makes the algorithm particularly well suited for treatment of complex geometries. The needed tangential differentiations, in turn, can easily be produced by means of differentiation of corresponding truncated Chebyshev expansions, with evaluation either via FFT or, for sufficiently small expansions, via direct summation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation