A Checklist Based Approach for Evaluating Augmented Reality Displays in Industrial Applications

Paelke, Volker; Büttner, Sebastian; Mucha, Henrik; Röcker, Carsten

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60474-9_21

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MEC-SPQ, in turn, has been developed for either real-life or virtual environments, therefore it often needs to be adjusted [23,40] for it to fit the purpose of AR research, where virtual and real-life are blended. This describes well the current status in evaluating AR applications, where most of the methods target usability or perception, not UX [7,9,26].…”

Section: Involving Usersmentioning

confidence: 72%

“…UX has been seen as a significant factor for a products' success [15,20]. Therefore, it is important to develop and use systematic, low-cost methods for UX evaluation and utilize the collected information in the early phase of the development process [26,27]. MAR has the potential to benefit user experience studies because it makes it possible to record experiences before, during, and after the use of products or services [26].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mobile Augmented Reality Client as a UX Method for Living Lab's User Involvement Tool

Alavesa

Pakanen

Niemelä³

et al. 2018

Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper introduces an augmented reality application, AR PATIO, which was developed for an existing user involvement tool that is a part of a living lab. Augmented reality contents can be projected on-site to visualize change in a comprehensible and visual way. The aim of our application is to provide new methods for involving citizens in the innovation, co-creation, and evaluation of services and products in a living lab context. Our solution gives users the possibility to express their reactions by leaving location-based comments and feedback when using augmented reality. AR PATIO was evaluated as a part of a bigger user-experience study in which virtual reality and mobile clients were also tested. However, in this paper, we focus on the results from an AR use case. According to our UX study with 14 participants, AR PATIO created a positive experience. It was regarded as empowering, playful, innovative, and useful. CCS CONCEPTS• Human-centered computing -Human computer interaction (HCI); Mixed/augmented reality KEYWORDS Augmented reality, living lab, user involvement, user experience.

show abstract