“…Now we assume k ≥ 4, so that case (a) holds: between two successive t-elements, there are two elements with distinct labels in {s 1 , s 2 , s 3 }. Consider first t (1) , t (2) and assume without loss of generality that these labels are {s 1 , s 2 }. The possible labels in ]t (2) , t (3) [ are then either {s 1 , s 3 } or {s 2 , s 3 }; indeed {s 1 , s 2 } cannot occur since the same argument as in the previous paragraph shows that this forces k = 3.…”