2004
DOI: 10.1097/00130404-200401000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clue to the Therapy of Neurofibromatosis Type 2

Abstract: These results suggest that PAK1 is essential for the malignant growth of NF2-deficient cells, and that PAK1-blocking drugs could be potentially useful forthe treatment of neurofibromatosis types 2, in addition to Ras-induced cancers and neurofibromatosis type 1.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibitory effect of merlin on FAK activity could be either direct, as merlin has been previously shown to form a complex with FAK and NHERF (James et al, 2004), or indirect through inhibition of Rac/PAK signaling, which is known to cross-talk with FAK signaling (Hsia et al, 2003;Brown et al, 2005;Mitra et al, 2005). Indeed, we and others have previously linked merlin to Rac/PAK signaling, as PAK was found to be able to phosphorylate and inactivate merlin (Kissil et al, 2002;Xiao et al, 2002) and unphosphorylated merlin has been shown to inhibit PAK activity (Kissil et al, 2003;Hirokawa et al, 2004;Xiao et al, 2005) and Rac translocation to matrix adhesions (Okada et al, 2005). PAK activity has been shown to affect cell motility and directionality (Sells et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The inhibitory effect of merlin on FAK activity could be either direct, as merlin has been previously shown to form a complex with FAK and NHERF (James et al, 2004), or indirect through inhibition of Rac/PAK signaling, which is known to cross-talk with FAK signaling (Hsia et al, 2003;Brown et al, 2005;Mitra et al, 2005). Indeed, we and others have previously linked merlin to Rac/PAK signaling, as PAK was found to be able to phosphorylate and inactivate merlin (Kissil et al, 2002;Xiao et al, 2002) and unphosphorylated merlin has been shown to inhibit PAK activity (Kissil et al, 2003;Hirokawa et al, 2004;Xiao et al, 2005) and Rac translocation to matrix adhesions (Okada et al, 2005). PAK activity has been shown to affect cell motility and directionality (Sells et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recent studies by Kissil and co-workers have shown that merlin can also function to inhibit PAK activity (Kissil et al, 2003;Hirokawa et al, 2004), suggesting an intimate relationship between merlin and PAK, in which PAK can inhibit merlin function and merlin can, in turn, suppress PAK activity. This reciprocal regulation suggests that merlin growth suppression is a tightly regulated process, and that the target of merlin inhibition might also be involved in regulating merlin function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed additional motility regulators including Cdc42, Pak1, ROCK1 and ROCK2 (Klemke et al, 1998;Zhao et al, 2000;Kaempchen et al, 2003;Worthylake and Burridge, 2003;Hirokawa et al, 2004;Xiao et al, 2005) (Figure 4e-g). HEI10 depletion had no effect on the steady-state levels of Cdc42 or Pak1 and significantly decreased the levels of ROCK1 and ROCK2.…”
Section: Hei10 Is Required For Cell Proliferationmentioning
confidence: 99%