Syntax and Morphology Multidimensional 2011
DOI: 10.1515/9783110238754.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coanalysis approach to Polish past tense agreement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether combinations of pronominal affixes in European Portuguese should be taken to occupy distinct positions, or analysed as fused morphs, is an independent issue. See Crysmann (2003) for discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether combinations of pronominal affixes in European Portuguese should be taken to occupy distinct positions, or analysed as fused morphs, is an independent issue. See Crysmann (2003) for discussion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have argued that some of the morphemes at issue in Udi and in EP are affixes rather than clitics (Crysmann 2000, 2001, 2003, Luís 2004, Spencer & Luís 2005, 2012. In both languages, these morphemes have some of the characteristics of clitics, and we refer to them as clitics informally, while recognizing their other characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%