2022
DOI: 10.1080/21580103.2022.2072406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of forest area differences between statistics information and spatial thematic maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outputs from indirect monitoring methods, such as maps of forest attributes, provide key advantages compared to traditional surveys by delivering information on hard-to-reach forest areas and territory-wide spatial patterns [13][14][15]. Understanding the spatial patterns of forest attributes is particularly crucial for decision-making in forest management and conservation [16,17] since it enables the identification of biomass and biodiversity hot spots and rare and endangered habitats and species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outputs from indirect monitoring methods, such as maps of forest attributes, provide key advantages compared to traditional surveys by delivering information on hard-to-reach forest areas and territory-wide spatial patterns [13][14][15]. Understanding the spatial patterns of forest attributes is particularly crucial for decision-making in forest management and conservation [16,17] since it enables the identification of biomass and biodiversity hot spots and rare and endangered habitats and species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%