2022
DOI: 10.18502/jri.v23i1.8452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes Between Two Different Intramuscular Progesterone Preparations in Women Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles

Abstract: Background: The purpose of the current study was to assess if luteal support with intramuscular (IM) 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC) (Lentogest, IBSA, Italy) improves the pregnancy outcome in comparison to natural intramuscu-lar progesterone (Prontogest, AMSA, Italy) when administered to recipients in a frozen embryo transfer cycle. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was performed to evaluate outcomes between two different intramuscular regimens used for luteal support in frozen e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the abort rate was significantly higher in the sequential-dose group. This finding is consistent with the findings of some studies (19,20). Considering the higher rate of abortion in the sequentialdoes group, it can be concluded that the P4 level in women whose pregnancy had an abortion was higher compared to women who had a successful pregnancy, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our results showed that the abort rate was significantly higher in the sequential-dose group. This finding is consistent with the findings of some studies (19,20). Considering the higher rate of abortion in the sequentialdoes group, it can be concluded that the P4 level in women whose pregnancy had an abortion was higher compared to women who had a successful pregnancy, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%