2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the folding and misfolding pathways of the third PDZ domain of PSD95 investigated under different pH conditions

Abstract: comparative analysis of the folding and misfolding pathways of the third PDZ domain of PSD95 investigated under different pH conditions. Biophysical Chemistry, Elsevier, 2011, 158 (2-3) This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, Glu334 appears to play an important role in KKETAV binding via interactions with Lys-5 in the ligand. In a previous report, we proposed that these two salt-bridges are responsible for the pH dependency of the unfolding of the PDZ3 domain, which changes dramatically below pH 3.5 due to salt-bridge relaxation associated with the titration of solvent-exposed Glu residues [32]. The results presented here support the concept that the Glu401-Lys355 and Arg399-Glu334 salt-bridges play a critical role in binding linked to the α3 helix region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed above, Glu334 appears to play an important role in KKETAV binding via interactions with Lys-5 in the ligand. In a previous report, we proposed that these two salt-bridges are responsible for the pH dependency of the unfolding of the PDZ3 domain, which changes dramatically below pH 3.5 due to salt-bridge relaxation associated with the titration of solvent-exposed Glu residues [32]. The results presented here support the concept that the Glu401-Lys355 and Arg399-Glu334 salt-bridges play a critical role in binding linked to the α3 helix region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This interaction also occurs during binding of the CRIPT peptide to PSD-95-PDZ3 [30] and is considered a key interaction in class I PDZ domains [31]; however, to our knowledge, the energetic consequences of pH changes on this interaction have not yet been evaluated. Considering the lack of other titratable residues within this pH range in the vicinity of the PSD-95-PDZ3 binding site, and the fact that no substantial differences in stability and folding behaviour have been observed for the domain between pH 4.0 and pH 7.5 [32], it is reasonable to argue that entropic differences might arise from changes in the conformational entropy of ligand side chains interacting with His372 and not from significant conformational changes in the PDZ3 domain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We carried out experiments at 1.3 mg·mL −1 protein concentration under different pH conditions; within the range 2.5–3.5 we used Glycine/HCl and at pH 4.0 acetic/acetate buffer. The behaviour is qualitatively similar to PDZ3, since at pH values 4.0–7.5 traces are biphasic (Figure 2) and at more acidic conditions both transitions approach to a single transition but, differently, we could not properly fit any of them to the two-state model as done in PDZ3 [23]. In fact, fittings in Figure 2 were performed using whether the four-state model described above for pH 4.0, or the three-state model previously described for PDZ3 for traces at lower pH values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since a change in the conformational equilibrium of PDZ3 below pH 3 exists [23], we have studied here the pH behaviour of the Δ10ct-PDZ3 domain by DSC. We carried out experiments at 1.3 mg·mL −1 protein concentration under different pH conditions; within the range 2.5–3.5 we used Glycine/HCl and at pH 4.0 acetic/acetate buffer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation