2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10259-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, experts have applied the techniques to decision-making for many years to determine surface water potential zones by weighting thematic layers [26]. Since last few years, by employing MCDM, to monitor water quality, it initiates to produce better results on account of its reduction in the subjectivity in criteria selection and vast application fields [27,28,29]. Another important technique in MCDM, addressed as "The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, experts have applied the techniques to decision-making for many years to determine surface water potential zones by weighting thematic layers [26]. Since last few years, by employing MCDM, to monitor water quality, it initiates to produce better results on account of its reduction in the subjectivity in criteria selection and vast application fields [27,28,29]. Another important technique in MCDM, addressed as "The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this approach eliminates human bias and is highly objective when determining weights. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods can provide precise values with minimal effort in the creation of the WQI [7]. Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) is one of the most popular MCDM approach that discusses the direct and proportional dependence on the significance and utility of the available options in the presence of criteria that are in conflict with one another [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%