2017
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/22489.9607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of Two Different Dose Fractionation Regimens of High Dose Rate Intracavitary Brachytherapy in Treatment of Carcinoma of Uterine Cervix: A Prospective Randomized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of our present study was to compare two treatment schedules of HDR ICBT in cancer cervix in terms of late toxicities, local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates. In the past, many studies have compared higher dose per fraction with ABS recommended schedule, and the presented results are rewarding [7,8,9,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of our present study was to compare two treatment schedules of HDR ICBT in cancer cervix in terms of late toxicities, local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates. In the past, many studies have compared higher dose per fraction with ABS recommended schedule, and the presented results are rewarding [7,8,9,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescription and fractionation is ∼24 Gy in 3 fractions (as per Rao et al .) ( 5 ) with CT-based planning using parameters from the EMBRACE II protocol. Treatment is then delivered, and the implant removed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this was unavailable, 2D point-based planning was strongly recommended [25,[33][34][35][36][37]. ASTRO also strongly recommended total EQD2 of brachytherapy and EBRT to >80 Gy [13,25,30,38]. A D90 ≥8500 cGy was conditionally recommended for tumors that poorly responded to EBRT or tumors >4 cm, with careful consideration to normal tissue constraints [18,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%