A Comparative Investigation of the Predictive Validity of Four Indirect Measures of Bias and Prejudice

Axt, Jordan; Buttrick, Nicholas R.; Feng, Ruo Ying

doi:10.1177/01461672221150229

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 49 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Researchers that would like to assess implicit prejudice against Black women directly rather than in relation to a comparison category can use a variant of the IAT called the Single‐Category IAT (SC‐IAT; Karpinski & Steinman, 2006). The SC‐IAT only presents stimuli related to one target category (e.g., Black women) and has better predictive validity for many intergroup outcomes (Axt et al., 2023). This is because attitudes assessed using an SC‐IAT are not diluted by attitudes toward a comparison category.…”

Section: Measuring Implicit Prejudice Against Black Womenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

Phills

2024

Social & Personality Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses a critical gap in measuring and reducing implicit prejudice: biases against Black women and people with intersectional identities. Though social psychologists have published many methods to measure and interventions to reduce implicit prejudice against Black people, these methods often target biases against Black people or Black men rather than Black women. Thus, these methods may leave Black women out because the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ and the mental representation of Black people is more similar to the mental representation of Black men than Black women. This paper advocates for an intersectional approach to measuring and reducing implicit prejudice that accounts for the unique prejudices faced by Black women. Specifically, this paper argues that researchers should tailor their methods to account for how the mental representations of Black women and Black men differ including differences in stereotypic content and ambivalence. The paper concludes by acknowledging the difficulties related to developing long‐lasting interventions, the need to move beyond reducing implicit prejudice, and the value of studying the men and women of additional racial and ethnic groups and other intersections like sexual orientation and socioeconomic status.

show abstract

Section: Measuring Implicit Prejudice Against Black Womenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

Phills

2024

Social & Personality Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Healthcare providers’ psychological investment in clinical recommendations: Investigating the role of implicit racial attitudes

Duffy,

Bú,

Pereira

et al. 2024

Social Science & Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Temporal and Directional Relationship Between Group-Level Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias

Tang,

Hehman,

Chen

2024

Social Cognition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Explicit and implicit gender-science and gender-career biases have shifted toward neutrality in the past decade. Researchers speculate that these changes result from women's increased visibility in the science field and job market, but little is known about how the changes in group-level explicit and implicit gender-science and gender-career bias relate to one another over time. Building on contemporary models of group-level bias, this study investigates the temporal and directional relationship between group-level implicit and explicit gender bias between 2007 to 2016 using multivariate multilevel modeling. We found that lower group-level implicit bias in a previous month predicts lower group-level explicit bias in the following month. We also found evidence that group-level explicit bias in a previous month was positively associated with group-level implicit bias in the following month. These findings have practical and theoretical implications for understanding the bidirectional relationship between group-level implicit and explicit biases over time.

show abstract

A Comparative Investigation of the Predictive Validity of Four Indirect Measures of Bias and Prejudice

Cited by 3 publications

References 49 publications

Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

Measuring and reducing implicit prejudice against Black women and people with intersectional identities

Healthcare providers’ psychological investment in clinical recommendations: Investigating the role of implicit racial attitudes

The Temporal and Directional Relationship Between Group-Level Implicit and Explicit Gender Bias

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About