2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1207809/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative investigation of using microbial- and CO2-induced carbonate minerals in sustainable soil Improvement

Abstract: The structure and shape of carbonate crystals formed by microbial activity and carbon dioxide reaction were investigated in this work. The mineral carbonates treated sandy soil was subsequently determined using unconfined compression tests (UCS). Sporoscarcina pasteurii bacteria were used to produce an aqueous solution of free carbonate ions (CO32-) under laboratory circumstances called microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). In CO2- induced carbonate precipitation, carbon dioxide was added to a sodi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, more and more researchers have begun to conduct in-depth research on this technology. It can be better applied to the fields such as sand control [4,5], heavy metal fixation [6,7], crack repair [8,9], reservoir profile control and water plugging [10,11], and CO 2 capture and storage [12,13] by changing various factors. In the future, it will be applied to a wider range of fields with the further maturity of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, more and more researchers have begun to conduct in-depth research on this technology. It can be better applied to the fields such as sand control [4,5], heavy metal fixation [6,7], crack repair [8,9], reservoir profile control and water plugging [10,11], and CO 2 capture and storage [12,13] by changing various factors. In the future, it will be applied to a wider range of fields with the further maturity of this technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%