2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of analytical methodologies to determine the soil organic matter content of Lithuanian Eutric Albeluvisols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For samples with apparent larger amount of SOM, there is a larger LOI, such as MA0-19 and MA80-100, which is similar to the previous studies (Konen et al 2002;Jankauskas et al 2006;Abella and Zimmer 2007). The overall LOI values for surface soil samples are larger than those for subsurface soil samples.…”
Section: Loss On Ignition Results Of Soil Samplessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For samples with apparent larger amount of SOM, there is a larger LOI, such as MA0-19 and MA80-100, which is similar to the previous studies (Konen et al 2002;Jankauskas et al 2006;Abella and Zimmer 2007). The overall LOI values for surface soil samples are larger than those for subsurface soil samples.…”
Section: Loss On Ignition Results Of Soil Samplessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The survey collected and analyzed soil samples for genesis, physical, chemical and biological properties. The SOM content was tested using the potassium dichromate titrimetric method (Jankauskas et al, 2006). The SOM data in this study were obtained for 258 soil samples (0-20 cm), together with the corresponding GPS location coordinates.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOCC DC = 0.40, SD: 0.02; avg. SOCC WO = 0.36, SD: 0.02), the t test (Sokal and Rohlf 1995) was applied to both data sets with and without the application of general conversion coefficient between DC and WO methods compiled by Jankauskas et al (2006). Based on the test results, alternative hypothesis about significant difference between sample means was rejected (P = 0.83-0.57).…”
Section: Soil Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%