2014
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of atmospheric Maxwell current and electric field from a low latitude station, Tirunelveli

Abstract: Simultaneous measurements of atmospheric Maxwell current and electric field, using horizontal long wire antenna and passive horizontal wire antenna system at 1 m above the Earth's surface, were carried out at Tirunelveli (8.7 • N, 77.8• E), India, during January/February 2002. The objectives of the present work have been to understand the nature of the measured atmospheric electrical parameters and explore the possibility of detecting the signature associated with the global thunderstorm activity. As the me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The raw data sets reveal that the current density begins to rise at local sunrise at approximately 01:00 UT, and the normal daytime value is reached in less than 2 h after the sunrise. This feature is often referred to as the 'sunrise effect' (Muir, 1975;Panneerselvam et al, 2003). It is believed to be associated with the generation of a pre-dawn layer of positive charges close to the surface (the electrode effect) and the subsequent uplifting of the layer through upward convection generated by surface solar heating (Marshall et al, 1999).…”
Section: Diurnal Variation At Tirunelveli Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The raw data sets reveal that the current density begins to rise at local sunrise at approximately 01:00 UT, and the normal daytime value is reached in less than 2 h after the sunrise. This feature is often referred to as the 'sunrise effect' (Muir, 1975;Panneerselvam et al, 2003). It is believed to be associated with the generation of a pre-dawn layer of positive charges close to the surface (the electrode effect) and the subsequent uplifting of the layer through upward convection generated by surface solar heating (Marshall et al, 1999).…”
Section: Diurnal Variation At Tirunelveli Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time constant (RC) of the electric circuit is 1 s. In our experiment, we use a long-wire antenna of 144 m in length and 3 mm in diameter that would collect incoming charges from the atmosphere. The sensor is supported 1 m above the ground by means of masts that are electrically separated by Teflon rods (Panneerselvam et al, 2003). It is connected to an electrometer (AD 549) that has high-input impedance on the order of 10 9 and permits extremely low-input bias current (10 14 A).…”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Pune, the sunrise effect (0430 UT) was more pronounced and this was attributed to aerosols, because of the time of occurrence (0900 LT) and given its tropical semi-urban industrial surroundings (Latha, 2003). At another tropical station, Tirunelveli, it was reported from 2 months of data that the sunrise effect was short lived while the evening maxima (1900 UT) was prolonged (Panneerselvam et al, 2003). For all stations mentioned in Table 1 except for Suva and Vostok, the measured peak around 1900 UT was in the local afternoon or evening, which overlaps with the peak in the respective regional thunderstorm activity.…”
Section: Comparison With Global Trendsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Tinsley et al, 2007). In spite of the long history of research in this field (Wilson, 1920), the causal mechanism for the variations in the Earth's electrical environment is not completely understood (Panneerselvam et al, 2003;Reddell et al, 2004). Possible reasons for this are, most of the atmospheric electrical measurements were episodic and the results were seldom complemented with the in situ meteorological data (Israelsson and Tammet, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the digitized signal is 2.44 mV that will correspond to a current of 0.5 pA. The data are recorded at a sampling interval of one second (Panneerselvam et al, 2003).…”
Section: Description Of the Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%