A Comparative Study of Milestones for Featuring GUI Prototyping Tools

Silva, Thiago Rocha; Hak, Jean-Luc; Winckler, Marco; Nicolas, Olivier

doi:10.4236/jsea.2017.106031

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Wireframing is creating a simple, low-fidelity representation of the interface. The method is similar to paper-based, but wireframing tools are used, such as Balsamiq, Silk (Silva et al, 2017), Axure, and Sketch.…”

Section: Zaključekmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Collaborative Business Intelligent Framework: Crowdsourcing Approach

Cherednichenko¹,

Vovk²,

Sutiahin³

2023

42nd International Conference on Organizational Science Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative Business Intelligence goes beyond the organization frame and collecting people in one virtual space in order to give their opinion concerning certain issue results in an opportunity to boost the decision-making process and make it more reasonable. Strangers solve one problem without direct interaction and use the developed results. Tourists often search for information from different sources and compare found facts. It takes a lot of time and effort. So, having an application, where users could find relevant information and use it for decisionmaking is essential. The aim of the paper is to develop an application for tourists using which they could make a decision about where and why to go. We propose an approach to collect and clear data related to tourism, preprocess and structure tourism data convenient interface and tools for collaborative analysis.

show abstract

Section: Zaključekmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards Collaborative Business Intelligent Framework: Crowdsourcing Approach

Cherednichenko¹,

Vovk²,

Sutiahin³

2023

42nd International Conference on Organizational Science Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A general review of prototyping tools and techniques can be found in [27,28]. For a review of the history of graphical user interface prototyping tools see [29,30].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experiences Using Three App Prototyping Tools with Different Levels of Fidelity from a Product Design Student’s Perspective

Figliolia

Sandnes

Médola

2020

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prototyping has become a widely embraced technique in different design fields to facilitate early user involvement to ensure that the end-product meets the users' needs. Each design field has its tools and traditions for working with prototypes. This paper documents experiences with smartphone app prototyping from a product design student's perspective. Three prototyping tools with different fidelity levels were explored. Based on these experiences we reflect upon the prototyping tool characteristics and their suitability for non-computer scientist. We envisage that our experiences may be useful for other product designers who want to develop smartphone apps.

show abstract

“…Finally, previous studies [27], [28] which analyzed the current state-of-the-art prototyping tools have concluded that features to support (at some level) the assessment of prototypes and scenario-based specifications have been covered by less than 10% of the tools analyzed.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There are multiple notations and tools with different implementations for designing and modeling GUI prototypes [27]. Among these, we have chosen to implement a proof of concept of our approach with the wireframe sketching tool Balsamiq 1 in its current version (2.2.28), since it is a wide-spread and highly-regarded prototyping tool and uses a documented XML format for persisting the prototypes.…”

Section: The Proposed Approach For Automated Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ensuring the Consistency Between User Requirements and GUI Prototypes: A Behavior-Based Automated Approach

Silva

Winckler

Trætteberg

2019

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a user-centered design process, graphical user interface (GUI) prototypes may be seen as an important early artifact to design and validate user requirements before making strong commitments with a full-fledged version of the user interface. Ensuring the consistency of GUI prototypes with other representations of the user requirements is then a critical aspect of the design process. This paper presents an approach which extends Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) by employing an ontology in order to provide automated assessment for GUI prototypes as design artifacts. The approach has been evaluated by exploiting user requirements described by a group of experts in the flight tickets e-commerce domain. Such requirements gave rise to a set of User Stories that have been used to automatically check the consistency of Balsamiq prototypes which were reengineered from an existing web system for booking business trips. The results have shown our approach was able to identify different types of inconsistencies in the set of analyzed artifacts, allowing to build an effective correspondence between user requirements and their representation in GUI prototypes.

show abstract

A Comparative Study of Milestones for Featuring GUI Prototyping Tools

Cited by 16 publications

References 21 publications

Towards Collaborative Business Intelligent Framework: Crowdsourcing Approach

Towards Collaborative Business Intelligent Framework: Crowdsourcing Approach

Experiences Using Three App Prototyping Tools with Different Levels of Fidelity from a Product Design Student’s Perspective

Ensuring the Consistency Between User Requirements and GUI Prototypes: A Behavior-Based Automated Approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About