2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-1929-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design

Abstract: Background: The well-being of mothers of infants requiring Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization may be affected by the architectural design of the unit. A few recent studies suggest there may be some drawbacks of single-family rooms (SFRs) for infants and their mothers, such as isolation of mothers and reduced exposure to auditory stimulation for infants. Purpose: To compare NICU-stress, symptoms of depression, perceptions of nurse-parent support and family-centered care, sleep disturbances, bre… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
27
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 21 ] showed that mothers were more involved in infant care in the SFR unit than in the open unit, but the duration of mothers’ presence was not measured, and fathers’ participation was not studied. Feeley et al [ 22 ] compared mothers’ presence in an open unit, in a combined pod and in an SFR design and found that mothers spent 44 h per week in the open unit compared to 84 h per week in the SFR unit. Raiskila et al [ 23 ] showed that the duration of parents’ presence was significantly longer in units that provided parents an opportunity to stay overnight: a mean of 19.7 h per day in units with overnight accommodations versus a mean of 5.5 h in units without.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 21 ] showed that mothers were more involved in infant care in the SFR unit than in the open unit, but the duration of mothers’ presence was not measured, and fathers’ participation was not studied. Feeley et al [ 22 ] compared mothers’ presence in an open unit, in a combined pod and in an SFR design and found that mothers spent 44 h per week in the open unit compared to 84 h per week in the SFR unit. Raiskila et al [ 23 ] showed that the duration of parents’ presence was significantly longer in units that provided parents an opportunity to stay overnight: a mean of 19.7 h per day in units with overnight accommodations versus a mean of 5.5 h in units without.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this is a secondary analysis, the full data from the original study have been published previously (Feeley et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a secondary analysis of data from a quasi-experimental pre-post study carried out between 2014 and 2017 (Feeley et al, 2020). The aim of the original study was to compare mothers' stress, symptoms of depression, perception of nurseparent support, family-centered care, sleep disturbances, breastfeeding self-efficacy and readiness for discharge of mothers whose infants were hospitalized in an open ward (OW) NICU to mothers whose infants were hospitalized in a NICU with pods and singlefamily rooms (pods/SFR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pod-style NICUs do not provide private space for mothers to deliver nonpharmacologic care such as breastfeeding or skin-to-skin [ 31 33 ]. Further, pods often do not offer a welcoming or conducive environment for 24/7 visitation [ 22 34 ]. Private room NICUs are costly and may not be a realistic solution for many hospitals [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%