2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-022-03859-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of strength reduction and gravity increase methods considering random fields in slope stability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the gravity increase method is to keep the microscopic parameters between the particles unchanged and to destabilise the slope by increasing the gravitational acceleration so that the soil particles are subjected to a force greater than their shear strength (Cecílio, D. L, et al, 2020) [12]. Its slope damage under different freeze-thaw cycle conditions is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Figure 15 Vertical Jointed Slope Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the gravity increase method is to keep the microscopic parameters between the particles unchanged and to destabilise the slope by increasing the gravitational acceleration so that the soil particles are subjected to a force greater than their shear strength (Cecílio, D. L, et al, 2020) [12]. Its slope damage under different freeze-thaw cycle conditions is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Figure 15 Vertical Jointed Slope Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%