2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of structural, thermal, and optoelectronic properties between zircon and scheelite type structures in SrMoO4 compound: An ab-initio study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dos Santos et al [56] and Zhang et al [51] synthesized SrMoO 4 microcrystal by the sonochemical method with E gap of 4.05 eV and 3.72 eV, respectively, but, to date, no E gap values associated with SrWO 4 crystals synthesized by the sonochemical method on the micro scale have been reported. Theoretical studies estimate E gap values for SrMoO 4 crystals between 3.69 and 5.35 eV [5,[77][78][79] and for SrWO 4 between 4.41 and 5.37 eV [80][81][82][83]. Therefore, the data discussed so far suggest that the E gap values estimated in this work are within the range of expected values.…”
Section: Sonophotocatalytic Activities Measurementssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Dos Santos et al [56] and Zhang et al [51] synthesized SrMoO 4 microcrystal by the sonochemical method with E gap of 4.05 eV and 3.72 eV, respectively, but, to date, no E gap values associated with SrWO 4 crystals synthesized by the sonochemical method on the micro scale have been reported. Theoretical studies estimate E gap values for SrMoO 4 crystals between 3.69 and 5.35 eV [5,[77][78][79] and for SrWO 4 between 4.41 and 5.37 eV [80][81][82][83]. Therefore, the data discussed so far suggest that the E gap values estimated in this work are within the range of expected values.…”
Section: Sonophotocatalytic Activities Measurementssupporting
confidence: 72%