A Comparative Study on the Spatial Layout of Hui-Style and Wu-Style Traditional Dwellings and Their Culture Based on Space Syntax

Abstract

Hui-style and Wu-style traditional dwellings adopt different connection modes, reflecting different spatial characteristics and resulting in different spatial layout characteristics. The rationale for this is related to the differences between the two schools of Confucianism culture: the Huizhou culture emphasizes the commercial application of Confucianism and pays more attention to the idea of commercialization, and the space exhibits a certain degree of freedom, while the Wuzhou culture emphasizes the official application of Confucianism and pays more attention to the idea of officialization, and the space is more systematic compared to Hui-style traditional dwellings, more profoundly articulating the traditional notions of propriety. Therefore, this paper attempts to explore the correspondence between the spatial layout of traditional dwellings and Confucianism culture through a comparative analysis of the spatial layout characteristics of the two schools of traditional dwellings, and to provide reference for similar studies.

Regional Architecture Building Identity: The Mediating Role of Authentic Pride

“…Min-style architecture is deeply influenced by Feng Shui concepts in its design and layout, with the positioning, direction, and internal layout of buildings adhering to the principles of Feng Shui, aiming to create an auspicious and harmonious living environment [22] (Figure 1b). Hui-style and Min-style architectures in ancient times were both products of clan settlements [21,23]. Although each Hui-style building has an independent layout, in the ancient Huizhou area, members of the same clan typically lived within the same village [12].…”

“…Hui-style and Min-style architectures in ancient times were both products of clan settlements [21,23]. Although each Hui-style building has an independent layout, in the ancient Huizhou area, members of the same clan typically lived within the same village [12].…”

“…In this process, architecture becomes a bridge connecting individuals with society, and the past with the present, promoting the formation and development of identity [31,32]. For example, Hui-style architecture and Hakka enclosed houses are not just places of residence; they also serve as visual presentations of Huizhou and Minnan Hakka cultures, reflecting the history, social structure, and cultural values of these communities [20,23].…”

“…These motivations for choosing specific regional architecture elaborate on the multidimensional factors through which architecture impacts identity. Specifically, clan heritage and historical value relate directly to continuity and a sense of belonging, reinforcing identity rooted in tradition [23]. Similarly, aesthetic preferences and the pursuit of individuality reflect how architectural choices express personal values and tastes, further shaping an individual's self-concept [64,65].…”