1992
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0327(92)90075-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison between delusional and non-delusional depressives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also seems to be a common clinical assumption that psychosis is simply an indicator of the degree of severity in depression and that psychosis will eventually develop if a depression becomes sufficiently severe. This ‘severity-psychosis’ hypothesis is supported by some studies of PD [35,36] and also underlies the current classification of PD in both the DSM-IV and the ICD-10, where the disorder only figures as a subtype of severe depression. However, recent findings call into question this theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It also seems to be a common clinical assumption that psychosis is simply an indicator of the degree of severity in depression and that psychosis will eventually develop if a depression becomes sufficiently severe. This ‘severity-psychosis’ hypothesis is supported by some studies of PD [35,36] and also underlies the current classification of PD in both the DSM-IV and the ICD-10, where the disorder only figures as a subtype of severe depression. However, recent findings call into question this theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Concomitant psychotropic drugs were not allowed, except flurazepam at bedtime (upto 45 mg) or lithium maintenance (n ¼ 27). A decrease in HAMD scores to 8 or less, with Delusion factor equal to 0 (items 2, 15, 20) [Bellini et al, 1992;Bech et al, 1993;Sobin and Sackeim, 1997], was considered the response criterion. After the procedure had been fully explained to all subjects, informed consent was obtained.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAMD items were pooled into the following factors: Core (items 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 13), Sleep (items 4, 5, 6), Activity (items 7, 8), Psychic anxiety (items 9, 10), Somatic anxiety (items 11, 12, 13), Delusion (items 2, 15, 20). [32][33][34][35][36][37] The power of our sample for detecting differences amongst 5-HTTLPR variants was calculated considering an alpha value of 5% two-tailed. With these parameters in our sample we had a high power (0.80) to detect a medium-small effect size (0.35) that corresponded to a difference of approximately 2.1 points between the two alleles on the total HAMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%