2018
DOI: 10.21608/ejhm.2018.11383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison between Post-Operative Analgesia after Intrathecal Injection of Nalbuphine versus Fentanyl as an Adjuvent to Bupivacaine after Cesarean Section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 Other studies favored the use of intrathecal nalbuphine as it provided better postoperative analgesia and lower + adverse events than fentanyl or midazolam. [15][16][17] Further studies informed better outcomes achieved by intrathecal midazolam over nalbuphine. 18,19 On the contrary, Sawhney et al, who studied the impact of combining fentanyl or midazolam with LA in lower limb operations versus bupivacaine alone, stated that adding adjuvants did not significantly extend the length of the block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Other studies favored the use of intrathecal nalbuphine as it provided better postoperative analgesia and lower + adverse events than fentanyl or midazolam. [15][16][17] Further studies informed better outcomes achieved by intrathecal midazolam over nalbuphine. 18,19 On the contrary, Sawhney et al, who studied the impact of combining fentanyl or midazolam with LA in lower limb operations versus bupivacaine alone, stated that adding adjuvants did not significantly extend the length of the block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%